▾

External sources (not reviewed)

respect of shares or any other payment to be made by the Company to any shareholder is of such a small amount as to make payment to that shareholder in the relevant currency impracticable or unduly expensive either for the Company or the shareholder then such dividend or other distribution or other payment may, at the discretion of the Board, be paid or made in the currency of the country of the relevant shareholder (as indicated by the address of such shareholder on the register).

The Non-Aligned Movement condemns in the strongest terms Israel’s blatant disregard of Security Council resolution 1860 (2009), which was adopted by the Council on 8 January 2009 and which calls, inter alia, for an immediate ceasefire, and its flagrant defiance of the repeated calls from the international community for a complete cessation of military activities and of the serious regional and international diplomatic efforts under way to resolve the current crisis.

(L.N. 129 of 2009; L.N. 245 of 2009) (6) No debate may arise on any address presented by a Member or a designated public officer under subrule (3), (4A) or (5) but the President may in his discretion allow short questions to be put to the Member or the designated public officer making the address for the purpose of elucidating any matter raised by the Member or the designated public officer in the course of his address.

(ii) The Directors may do all acts and things considered necessary or expedient to give effect to any capitalization pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (a), with full power to the Directors to make such provisions as they think fit in the case of shares becoming distributable in fractions (including provisions whereby, in whole or in part, fractional entitlements are aggregated and sold and the net proceeds distributed to those entitled, or are disregarded or rounded up or down or whereby the benefit of fractional entitlements accrues to the Company rather than to the members concerned).

[...] guidelines is attributable to the joint efforts of author departments and the Department, with the latter having made dynamic and robust efforts to monitor [...] [...]

[...] impetuous, undignified "utterances, declarations, threats, and harangues" [...] [...]

Assuming 1,964,000,000 Meadville Shares in issue as at the Distribution Date, each Shareholder will receive a dividend of approximately HK$3.17 for each Meadville Share, comprising (i) HK$1.888 in cash and (ii) 0.0185 TTM Share (or the amount of the net cash proceeds of sale of the relevant TTM Share(s) in the case of those Shareholders who have elected or deemed to have elected option (c) on the Form of Election).

[...] [...] Luk said he did not know the basis of such judgment, and it was nonsense.

Over the past several days, the most senior Iranian leaders have issued yet another series of outrageous statements, which called for the destruction of Israel and spread the vile anti-Semitism that forms the core of their ideology.

(f) the Board may resolve that the shares to be allotted shall be allotted at a premium provided that the premium is credited as fully paid up and in such case the Board shall in addition to the amount to be capitalised and applied pursuant to sub-paragraph (e) above, and for the purpose therein set out, capitalise and apply out of the amount standing to the credit of the share premium account or out of any part of the undivided profits of the Company (including profits carried and standing to the credit of any reserve or reserves or other special account) as the Board may determine, a sum equal to the aggregate amount of the premium on the shares to be allotted and shall apply the same together with the sum to be applied pursuant to sub-paragraph (e) above and on the basis therein set out in paying up in full the appropriate number of unissued shares for allotment and distribution to and amongst the holders of the Elected Shares.

Urges the Government of Kyrgyzstan to promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, in particular, to address ongoing arbitrary detentions, torture and corruption by law enforcement and Government officials

It was agreed that the discussion of collusion should include the following elements: (a) collusion occurs where two or more suppliers or contractors, or one or more supplier(s) or contractor(s) and the procuring entity, work in tandem to manipulate the market in a way detrimental to obtaining an optimal outcome in the given procurement; (b) the manipulation might affect the price, keeping it artificially high, or other elements of a submission (such as the quality offered); alternatively, it could involve an agreement to share the market by artificially inflating prices or artificially distorting other elements of a submission, or an agreement not to present submissions or otherwise to distort fair competition; (c) collusion would probably violate the law of the State; (d) collusion involved the intention of the parties concerned to collude; and (e) the complicity of representatives of the procuring entity in collusion was not uncommon.

In connection with the latter, the Advisory Committee was informed that, in the testing stages of the software, it became clear that technical shortfalls would make the system an inadequate solution, particularly for peacekeeping missions.

Security Council resolutions 1718 (2006) and 1874 (2009) which the hostile forces regard as the “ground” for taking issue with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s satellite launch are a product of their high-handed policy for antagonizing and oppressing the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the height of illegality; they are faked up at random, disregarding even universally accepted international law.

In the case of UNMISS, the international and national posts proposed to be transferred to the Regional Service Centre were already located at Entebbe (see para. 269 below); the national posts would therefore be transferred, with their incumbents, to the Regional Service Centre.

[...] between old-school rhetoric and current [...]

The pattern of introducing the reports [...] [...]

It was clear that implementation of the outstanding provisions of Council resolution 1559 (2004) required the Security Council to bring pressure to bear on Israel in order to compel it to withdraw from the Lebanese territory it continued to occupy and to cease its repeated violations of Lebanese sovereignty.

[...] request has been repeatedly made despite the [...] [...]

In the case of UNAMID in Darfur and with AMISOM, the Departments and the African Union were engaged in the introduction of new models of field operations to respond to the need for interventions (see sect. D and sect. E below).