[...] [...] approximately HK$3.31 million and approximately HK$[0.96] million respectively for the royalty fee to No-Tape Japan, in which (a) approximately HK$2.29 million, approximately HK$1.62 million, approximately HK$0.31 million and approximately HK$[0.07] million waspaid for royalty fee for the products solely developed by No-Tape Japan respectively; and (b) nil, approximately HK$1.72 million, approximately HK$2.99 million and approximately HK$[0.89] million was paid for royalty fee for [...][...]

In accordance with article 11 of the Rules and Regulations, claims are eligible for inclusion in the Register if: (a) the claimant is a natural or legal person; (b) the claimant has substantially met the technical requirements for submitting a claim; (c) the claim is within the jurisdiction of the Register of Damage; (d) the claimant has established a legal interest in the claimed damage; (e) the claimed damage is material; (f) the claimant has established a causal link between the claimed damage and the construction of the Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory; (g) the claimed damage was in fact sustained; (h) the documents and assertions in support of the claim are substantially consistent; and (i) the claim has been established prima facie, based on the information and documents submitted by the claimant, giving the claimant the benefit of the doubt in appropriate cases and bearing in mind the varying circumstances with regard to title and residency status of claimants.

These matters include the questions whether: (a)the grantor has to be the same person as the borrower; (b) the security agreement secures all the relevant obligations; (c) the security right is subject to any legal restrictions; (d) there must be a clear payment schedule in the credit; (e) there are any special rights or obligations (such as rights of way or rights of access to a site); (f) there are any special obligations for the preservation of encumbered assets; (g) there are any obligations not to transfer the encumbered asset or create another security [...][...]

The Committee on Contributions conducted its work on the basis of its general mandate, as contained in rule 160 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly; the original terms of reference of the Committee contained in chapter IX, section 2, paragraphs 13 and 14, of the report of the Preparatory Commission (PC/20) and in the report of the Fifth Committee (A/44), adopted during the first part of the first session of the General Assembly on 13 February 1946 (resolution 14 (I) A, para. 3); and the mandates contained in General Assembly resolutions 46/221 B, 48/223 C, 53/36 D, 54/237 C and D, 55/5 B and D, 57/4 B, 58/1 A and B, 59/1 A and B, 60/237, 61/2, 61/237 and 64/248.

The benchmarks adopted so far include: (a) adoption of a formal ERMpolicy since2008; (b)an active enterprise risk management committee chaired by the Associate Administrator; (c) a formal implementation strategy for the adoption of ERM in UNDP; (d) dedicated training of staff on the policies and toolkits for ERM (e) clear procedures for the identification, reporting and escalation of relevant risks through the reporting lines for consideration by the ERM committee; (f) dedicated resources for monitoring of and follow up on the corporate risks log; (f) an enabling system for the reporting and review of unit-level and corporate risk; (h) progressively integrated [...][...]

[...] [...] positions abovethe NO-Blevel, and they [...][...]

(b) (i) The shares allotted pursuant to the provisionsof paragraph (a) shall rank pari passu in all respects with the shares of the same class (if any) then in issue save only as regards participation in the relevant dividend.

Accordingly, if a shareholder wishes to nominate a person to stand for election as a Director of the Company at the general meeting, the following documents must be validly served on the Company Secretary at the principle office of the Company in Hong Kong, namely (i) his/her notice of intention to propose a resolution at the general meeting; and (ii) a notice signed by the nominated candidate of the candidate’s willingness to be appointed together with (a) that candidate’s information as required to be disclosed under rule 13.51(2) of the Listing Rules, and (b)the candidate’s written consent to the publication of his/her personal data.

[...] public meetings onthe Commission on the Status of Women; (b) annual Hiroshima/Nagasaki commemoration programmes pertaining to the abolition of nuclear weapons; (c) national conferences on women and peace, disarmament, non-violence and sustainable clean energy; (d) various discussions and events on the implementation of Security Council resolution 1325 (2000); (e) campaigns such as “Make Poverty History”; (f) public lectures on the abolition of war, women and development, anti-trafficking and demilitarization; (g) a peacebuilding symposium in Rwanda; (h) presentations to examine the impact of war on youth and to mark the sixtieth anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; (i) workshops for Somali youth [...][...]

UNDP agrees with the 13 JIU recommendations including (a)development of a comprehensive business case with consideration of alternative options; (b) negotiation with the host country government; (c) accounting for the full cost of offshoring; (d) establishment of project oversight teams; (e) seeking funding approval for potential separation liabilities linked to offshoring; (f) appropriate change management planning; (g) ensuring readiness [...][...]

[...] World SocialForum,in Januaryin Bamako; (b) ministerial meeting of Coordinating Office of NAM, in May in Malaysia; (c) World Peace Forum, in June in Vancouver, Canada; (d) civil society forum on creating an environment at the local and international levels to provide employment and decent work for all and its impact on sustainable development, in June in Geneva; (e) meeting of Arab Solidarity Committees, in August in Amman; (f) United Nations International Conference of Civil Society in Support of the Palestinian People, in September in Geneva; (g) fourteenth NAM Summit, in September in Havana; (h) International Solidarity Meeting with the People of the Middle East, in October in Larnaca, Cyprus; (i) Meeting on “Russia, Asia and Africa: 50 Years of Solidarity and Cooperation”, in November [...][...]

[...] [...] Professional Officers(NO-B/II) andGeneral [...][...]

[...] (a) theinflux ofunemployed returnees, including migrant workers, former combatants from Libya and armed Tuareg and Toubou elements into these countries, as well as the impact that their return is having on the socio-economic and political stability in the host communities; (b) the inflow of weapons into the region and the proliferation of small arms and light weapons, surface-to-air missiles and explosives; (c) the nature and the extent of criminal and terrorist activities in these countries and ongoing regional initiatives to address them; (d) the impact on the security sector; (e) the national operational capacity of the security sector; (f) judicial reform; (g) additional efforts needed to address the root causes of recurrent food insecurity and malnutrition, as well as other humanitarian issues; (h) youth unemployment; and (i) disaster risk [...]

Contractors were evaluated at levels A and B if they had provided raw data that could be used by the Authority for the purposes of environmental assessment and protection; levels C to E if they provided data or analysis that could be useful for regional environmental protection; and levels F to I if there were components within the environmental guidelines that had either not been evaluated or where the information collected was of little or no use for environmental assessment by the Authority.

The draft will contain specific provisions making for a higher level of compliance with the requirements established both in article 29 (a) (i) and (ii) of the Convention and, if the political parties follow the recommendations contained in the future royal decree, in article 29 (b) (i) of the Convention as well.

[...] [...] paragraph (a) of this Article, or during any period ending on the date when all the requirementsof sub-paragraphs (i) to (iv) of paragraph [...][...]

Ordinary resolutions will also be proposed at the Annual General Meeting in respect of the granting of the Issue Mandate to the Directors, in the terms set out in the notice of the Annual General Meeting, to allot, issue and deal with Shares not exceeding 20% of the aggregate nominal amount of the share capital of the Company in issue as at the date of passing the relevant resolution, and adding to the Issue Mandate so granted to the Directors any Shares representing the aggregate nominal amount of the Shares repurchased by the Company after the granting of the Repurchase Mandate, at any time during the period ended on the earliest of (a) the conclusion of the next annual general meeting of the Company; (b) the expiration of the period within which the next annual general meeting of the Company is required by the Articles or any applicable laws to be held; and (c) the date upon which such authority is revoked or varied by an ordinary resolution at a general meeting of Shareholders.

[...] [...] included: (a) capacity-building (training courses, projects) concerning food safety, animal and plant health, including promotionof risk analyses and developing base-level capacity to ensure national ability to monitor, diagnose, report and respond to pest and disease outbreaks; (b) the standard setting work of the Codex Alimentarius [...][...]

a) To define “pesticide” and other related terms in a way consistent with Codex; b) To provide a list of maximum residue limits (MRLs) and extraneous maximum residue limits (EMRLs), to adopt MRLs/EMRLs recommended by Codex as the backbone as well as the Codex’s classification of foods; c) To prohibit the import and sale of the concerned food for which no MRL/EMRL had been specified, unless DFEH was satisfied that the detected level would not be dangerous or prejudicial to health; d) To provide a list of exempted substances; e) To accept applications for adding / revising MRLs and exempted substances; f) To dovetail the proposed Regulation with the registration of pesticides for use on food crops under the PO, Cap. 133; and g) To commence the proposed Regulation after a two-year grace period.

[...] [...] processes by ensuring that (a) ithas a clear mandate linked to organizational objectives and is supported by an independent, objective and well-functioning management structure with approved annual work plans; (b) it secures and retains [...][...]

securities issued by the Company as permitted by Section 73A of the Ordinance (and no signature of any Director, officer or other person and no mechanical reproduction thereof shall be required on any such certificates or other document and any such certificates or other document to which such official seal is affixed shall be valid and deemed to have been sealed and executed with the authority of the Board notwithstanding the absence of any such signature or mechanical reproduction as aforesaid) and an official seal for use abroad under the provisions of the Companies Ordinance where and as the Board shall determine, and the Company may by writing under the seal appoint any agents or agent, committees or committee abroad to be the duly authorised agents of the Company for the purpose of affixing and using such official seal and they may impose such restrictions on the use thereof as may be thought fit.

[...] regard to the obligations contained in paragraph 3 (a) (i) of Security Council resolution 1591 (2005) referring to paragraphs7 and 8 ofSecurity [...][...]

As regards to the other print boards, the Court could not determine whether the buyer had lost its right to rescind on the basis of article 49 (2)(b)(i) CISG, since the seller had not argued on this point.

This would require, inter alia, that the provisions governing the applicability of EMSEA in cases of staff being assigned, or reassigned, to a non-family duty station, as contained in subparagraphs I.10 (b) and (c) of annex I to the Field Security Handbook, be removed with effect from five years after the implementation of the decision by the General Assembly.