The benchmarks adopted so far include: (a) adoption of a formal ERMpolicy since2008; (b)an active enterprise risk management committee chaired by the Associate Administrator; (c) a formal implementation strategy for the adoption of ERM in UNDP; (d) dedicated training of staff on the policies and toolkits for ERM (e) clear procedures for the identification, reporting and escalation of relevant risks through the reporting lines for consideration by the ERM committee; (f) dedicated resources for monitoring of and follow up on the corporate risks log; (f) an enabling system for the reporting and review [...][...]

Accordingly, if a shareholder wishes to nominate a person to stand for election as a Director of the Company at the general meeting, the following documents must be validly served on the Company Secretary at the principle office of the Company in Hong Kong, namely (i) his/her notice of intention to propose a resolution at the general meeting; and (ii) a notice signed by the nominated candidate of the candidate’s willingness to be appointed together with (a) that candidate’s information as required to be disclosed under rule 13.51(2) of the Listing Rules, and (b)the candidate’s written consent to the publication of his/her personal data.

[...] public meetings onthe Commission on the Status of Women; (b) annual Hiroshima/Nagasaki commemoration programmes pertaining to the abolition of nuclear weapons; (c) national conferences on women and peace, disarmament, non-violence and sustainable clean energy; (d) various discussions and events on the implementation of Security Council resolution 1325 (2000); (e) campaigns such as “Make Poverty History”; (f) public lectures on the abolition of war, women and development, anti-trafficking and demilitarization; (g) a peacebuilding symposium in Rwanda; (h) presentations to examine the impact of war on youth and to mark the sixtieth anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; (i) workshops for Somali youth [...][...]

These matters include the questions whether: (a) the grantor has to be the same person as the borrower; (b) the security agreement secures all the relevant obligations; (c) the security right is subject to any legal restrictions; (d) there must be a clear payment schedule in the credit; (e) there are any special rights or obligations (such as rights of way or rights of access to a site); (f) there are any special obligations for the preservation of encumbered assets; (g) there are any obligations not to transfer the encumbered asset or create another security right in it; (h) ways in which the grantor and other interested parties could be notified in the case of default and enforcement; (i) there should be a reference to extrajudicial enforcement; and (j) there should be a dispute resolution clause.

UNDP agrees with the 13 JIU recommendations including (a) development of a comprehensive business case with consideration of alternative options; (b) negotiation with the host country government; (c) accounting for the full cost of offshoring; (d) establishment of project oversight teams; (e) seeking funding approval for potential separation liabilities linked to offshoring; (f) appropriate change management planning; (g) ensuring readiness of the Enterprise Resource Planning system to support offshore service centres; (h) ensuring staff security and disaster plans are in place; and (i) exploiting the possibility of joint efforts with existing offshore centres of United Nations system organizations.

The Committee on Contributions conducted its work on the basis of its general mandate, as contained in rule 160 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly; the original terms of reference of the Committee contained in chapter IX, section 2, paragraphs 13 and 14, of the report of the Preparatory Commission (PC/20) and in the report of the Fifth Committee (A/44), adopted during the first part of the first session of the General Assembly on 13 February 1946 (resolution 14 (I) A, para. 3); and the mandates contained in General Assembly resolutions 46/221 B, 48/223 C, 53/36 D, 54/237 C and D, 55/5 B and D, 57/4 B, 58/1 A and B, 59/1 A and B, 60/237, 61/2, 61/237 and 64/248.

[...] World SocialForum,in Januaryin Bamako; (b) ministerial meeting of Coordinating Office of NAM, in May in Malaysia; (c) World Peace Forum, in June in Vancouver, Canada; (d) civil society forum on creating an environment at the local and international levels to provide employment and decent work for all and its impact on sustainable development, in June in Geneva; (e) meeting of Arab Solidarity Committees, in August in Amman; (f) United Nations International Conference of Civil Society in Support of the Palestinian People, in September in Geneva; (g) fourteenth NAM Summit, in September in Havana; (h) International Solidarity Meeting with the People of the Middle East, in October in Larnaca, Cyprus; (i) Meeting on “Russia, Asia and Africa: 50 Years of Solidarity and Cooperation”, in November [...][...]

As regards to the other print boards, the Court could not determine whether the buyer had lost its right to rescind on the basis of article 49 (2)(b)(i) CISG, since the seller had not argued on this point.

[...] [...] weapons, surface-to-air missiles and explosives; (c) the nature and the extent of criminal and terrorist activities in these countries and ongoing regional initiatives to address them; (d) the impact on the security sector; (e) the national operational capacity of the security sector; (f) judicial reform; (g) additional efforts needed to address the root causes of recurrent food insecurity and malnutrition, as well as other humanitarian issues; (h) youth unemployment; and (i) disaster risk evaluation.

Contractors were evaluated at levels A and B if they had provided raw data that could be used by the Authority for the purposes of environmental assessment and protection; levels C to E if they provided data or analysis that could be useful for regional environmental protection; and levels F to I if there were components within the environmental guidelines that had either not been evaluated or where the information collected was of little or no use for environmental assessment by the Authority.

In relation to the issue of national implementation, I would like to note that on 30 January 2012, the Panel of Experts transmitted to the Committee, in accordance with paragraph 1 (b) (i) of the Committee’s work programme, a quarterly assessment of the implementation reports submitted by Member States pursuant of paragraph 31 of resolution 1929 (2010), for the period from 1 November 2011 to 31 January 2012.

The draft will contain specific provisions making for a higher level of compliance with the requirements established both in article 29 (a) (i) and (ii) of the Convention and, if the political parties follow the recommendations contained in the future royal decree, in article 29 (b) (i) of the Convention as well.

The detainee may also exercise the right to have someone informed (see section 56) and to seek legal advice (see section 58) and mustbe informed that he has these rights (s.42(9)(b)(i)).

This would require, inter alia, that the provisions governing the applicability of EMSEA in cases of staff being assigned, or reassigned, to a non-family duty station, as contained in subparagraphs I.10 (b) and (c) of annex I to the Field Security Handbook, be removed with effect from five years after the implementation of the decision by the General Assembly.

The National Central Bureau carried out other specific work such as appointing the terrorism liaison official; linking the INTERPOL I-24/7 computer system and police units, giving the General Directorate of Migration and Immigration access to the Fixed Interpol Network Database and Mobile Interpol Network Database (FIND/MIND) to check passenger lists at the international airport in order to prevent terrorists from entering and passing through the country; updating the database of lost and stolen passports; and investigating and registering international foundations that wanted to operate in the country.

Ordinary resolutions will also be proposed at the Annual General Meeting in respect of the granting of the Issue Mandate to the Directors, in the terms set out in the notice of the Annual General Meeting, to allot, issue and deal with Shares not exceeding 20% of the aggregate nominal amount of the share capital of the Company in issue as at the date of passing the relevant resolution, and adding to the Issue Mandate so granted to the Directors any Shares representing the aggregate nominal amount of the Shares repurchased by the Company after the granting of the Repurchase Mandate, at any time during the period ended on the earliest of (a) the conclusion of the next annual general meeting of the Company; (b) the expiration of the period within which the next annual general meeting of the Company is required by the Articles or any applicable laws to be held; and (c) the date upon which such authority is revoked or varied by an ordinary resolution at a general meeting of Shareholders.