▾

External sources (not reviewed)

(g) The Supreme Court in Rabat set aside the sentence, considering that “the lack of replies to the requests [...] [...]

A rejection of the new application is subject to appeal to the competent migration court and further to the Migration Court of Appeal.

[...] [...] domestic court of the complainant’s [...] [...]

As specified in Article 4.4 of the Code, the WADA TUEC, upon request by Athletes who have been denied TUEs by an Anti-Doping Organization will review such decisions with the power to reverse them.

As a subsidiary argument, the State party considers that the complaint should be dismissed on the merits, since there is no serious reason to believe that the complainant’s removal to Haiti would expose him to a real, personal and imminent risk of torture.

As for the concept of an “establishment” in Israel pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1502(2) [Art. 2 (f) MLCBI], necessary to a finding that the foreign proceeding was a “foreign non-main proceeding” pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1502(5) [Art. 2 (c) MLCBI], the court found that the debtor had no “place of operations” or “economic activity” within Israel, rejecting the foreign representative’s argument that the foreign proceeding itself constituted such activity.

As their claims were rejected in both the criminal and civil proceedings, the Compensation Board could not offer redress to the petitioners.

[...] the application for a building permit [...] [...]

[...] Chamber also dismissed the appeals [...] [...]

The author stresses that the temporary suspension injunction and the urgent application for the protection of a fundamental freedom were found to be admissible but were rejected by the Council of State, whereas the application on the merits was found to be inadmissible, even though consistent jurisprudence has held that the stages of a competitive examination, such as the “qualification” stage, involve decisions and not preliminary acts and that it should therefore be possible to contest them at any time during the examination without it being necessary to await the publication of the final results on qualification.

The court will also dismiss a bankruptcy petition in which the assets of the insolvent debtor are not sufficient to cover the costs of the court proceedings.

According to one view, so long as the status of the conditional interpretative declaration as to correctness has not been, or cannot be, determined, such a conditional interpretative declaration must meet both the conditions for the permissibility of an interpretative declaration (in the event that the interpretation is ultimately shared by the other parties or established by a competent body) and the conditions for the permissibility of a reservation (in the event that the proposed interpretation is rejected).

He submits that when he appealed the refusal of the Prosecutor’s Office to file criminal charges against the police officers who had mistreated him, the case was assigned to the same prosecutor who rejected his complaint the first time.

Subsidiarily, it contends that the petitioners’ allegations are ill-founded, and should be rejected on the merits.

She gave examples of good practices, such as allowing human rights defenders to appeal against the rejection of their applications for registration, granting them protection or issuing visas to them, deleting clauses relating to sedition in national legislations, allocating direct financial assistance, inviting United Nations mechanisms to undertake country missions, allowing human rights defenders and civil society to participate in the framing of policies and legislation, and efforts to combat impunity.

In 2010, Baden-Württemberg’s Higher Administrative Court in Mannheim overruled a local farmer’s objection to the construction of the EPS.

In order to preserve States’ sovereignty and their independence, and to maintain international security, peace and stability, Syria calls on the United Nations and its bodies concerned with countering terrorism and the financing thereof, including the Security Council and its specialized subsidiary committee, as well as the Human Rights Council, to deny terrorists and those who support them any cover for their destructive practices.

[...] [...] regarding approvals and denials.

On 5 August 2010, the Supreme Administrative Court decided not to grant leave to appeal, whereby the decision to reject the author’s application became final and not subject to further appeal.

the time limit, reasonable under the circumstances, for filing a request for review of or appeal against the provisional refusal or for filing a response to the opposition, and the authority to which such request for review [...] [...]

Providing a petitioner with detailed reasons as to why their delisting request was accepted or denied is fundamental to ensuring that due process is followed.

Individuals whose request is refused can still receive support by registering with its services.

[...] [...] matter” and dismissed the Application [...]

A High Court judge dismissed the rape charge [...] [...]

On that basis, we cannot agree with the decision taken by the High Representative on 27 March that overruled the Central Election Commission’s decision on the formation of a new Government by the Bosniak entity.

In rejecting that claim, the Commission concluded that the Ethiopians were not expelled by the Eritrean Government or due to Government policy, but instead left for economic reasons or owing to dislocation associated with the war, reasons for which Eritrea was not responsible.

[...] [...] the date on which the notification of [...] [...]

In relation to the Secretary-General’s proposal concerning the provision of a mechanism for the dismissal of manifestly inadmissible cases by the United Nations Appeals Tribunal (A/66/275 and Corr.1, para. 255), delegations were not convinced that an amendment to the statute of the United Nations Appeals Tribunal was necessary in order to address the issue, which should be addressed through an amendment of the rules of procedure of the Tribunal.

[...] Supreme Court rejected a petition filed by Adalah against [...] [...]