▾

External sources (not reviewed)

At its sixty-first session, under the current item, the General Assembly urged all Member States to reject any denial of the Holocaust as a historical event (resolution 61/255).

The rejection of the application for a building permit in this case is in no way due to the author’s disability, but rather consistent with practice that applies equally to all.

[...] [...] it was also countered by other members [...][...]

Israel’s continuation of such illegal policies and practices, in addition to its continuing illegal, inhumane and shameful blockade of the Gaza Strip and the immeasurable suffering and trauma it is inflicting on the 1.5 million civilians imprisoned there, constitutes yet further irrefutable evidence of the occupying Power’s abject disregard for international law, including humanitarian and human rights law, as well as its rejection of the legitimate, inalienable and internationally recognized rights of the Palestinian people to self-determination and freedom in their homeland.

These activities openly violate the policies of the military high command and the Ministry of Defense, and should be rejected and duly sanctioned.

The author stresses that the temporary suspension injunction and the urgent application for the protection of a fundamental freedom were found to be admissible but were rejected by the Council of State, whereas the application on the merits was found to be inadmissible, even though consistent jurisprudence has held that the stages of a competitive examination, such as the “qualification” stage, involve decisions and not preliminary acts and that it should therefore be possible to contest them at any time during the examination without it being necessary to await the publication of the final results on qualification.

[...] [...] Zacharias is at painstorefute this calumny indirectly, [...][...]

The Thais countered that Cambodia had [...]

He submits that when he appealed the refusal of the Prosecutor’s Office to file criminal charges against the police officers who had mistreated him, the case was assigned to the same prosecutor who rejected his complaint the first time.

As specified in Article 4.4 of the Code, the WADA TUEC, upon request by Athletes who have been denied TUEs by an Anti-Doping Organization will review such decisions with the power to reverse them.

[...] court didnotrebut the complainants‟ [...][...]

the time limit, reasonableunder the circumstances, for filing a request for review of or appeal against the provisional refusal or for filing a response to the opposition, and the authority to which such request for review [...][...]

As for the concept of an “establishment” in Israel pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1502(2) [Art. 2 (f) MLCBI], necessary to a finding that the foreign proceeding was a “foreign non-main proceeding” pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1502(5) [Art. 2 (c) MLCBI], the court found that the debtor had no “place of operations” or “economic activity”within Israel, rejecting the foreign representative’s argument that the foreign proceeding itself constituted such activity.

They are divided into several general areas: community outreach; charting ideological developments and countering extremist messages; and improved prison and post-release monitoring.

In the first of the cases the trial was in progress, in the second it was scheduled and would start this month, while the third case was at the stage of deciding on the objections tothe indictment.

The Security Council is meeting on the eve of a historic moment, which must lead us to make an incontrovertible reality of a Palestinian State that is recognized and fully welcomed into the fold of this Organization, thereby finally implementing all the provisions of General Assembly resolution 181 (II), which calls specifically for the creation of two States in Palestinian land — one Arab, the other Jewish.

(2) (a) Any Office wishing to exercise such right shall notify its refusal to the International Bureau, together with a statement of all grounds, within the period prescribed by the law applicable to that Office and at the latest, subject to subparagraphs (b) and (c), before the expiry of one year from the date on which the notification of the extension referred to in paragraph (1) has been sent to that Office by the International Bureau.

According to Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the European Law Enforcement Agency and other international organizations, some of which I quoted in my statement earlier today, Kosovo is at the bottom of lists when it comes to human rights and security, contrary to Mr. Hoxhaj’s claims,in rebuttal to my statement, that it is a young, dynamic, developing democracy.

This presumption (provided that it is not conclusive) can help fill the inevitable legal vacuum between the formulation of the reservation and the declaration of its nullity; during this entire period (which may last several years), the author of the reservation has conducted itself as a party and been deemed to be so by the other parties.

It also recommends that the State party strengthen its awareness-raising and education efforts with the aim of completely eliminating this practice and countering its underlying arguments.

All bags must check to Incheon International Airport (ICN) only, except connections to KE1401, KE1403, KE 1405 and OZ8531 (ICN-Busan), where baggage can be checked through to Busan (as these flights are departing from the same international airport).

This position was counteredby the opposite view, which also held that CFC production phase-out agreements for swing plants specifically precluded the possibility of further Multilateral Fund assistance for those plants.

A refutation of the Synod of Chalcedon and of the Tome of Leo, written between 454 and 460, in two parts, according to the title, and concluding with extracts from the "Acts" of the Robber Synod and four documents connected with it.

It was his delegation’s understanding that the agenda item on assistance in mine action was intended neither to universalize the two conventions for States parties nor to impugn the “legality” of a State that used landmines in legitimate self-defence.

Given that context, it seemed difficult to adopt a decision that might contradict the final conclusions or the strategy that the African Union might wish to adopt and which would be applicable to the whole of Africa, rather than being confined to the problem of West Africa.

[...] [...] moored at piers; all vessels and persons [...][...]

In accordance with paragraph 28 of the report of the Informal Working Group of the Security Council on General Issues of Sanctions (S/2006/997), where it is stated that rebuttals, with an assessment of their credibility, and corrections regarding already published allegations, should be included in subsequent reports, the Group has made efforts to respond to communications regarding particular cases.

She gave examples of good practices, such as allowing human rights defenders to appeal against the rejection of their applications for registration, granting them protection or issuing visas to them, deleting clauses relating to sedition in national legislations, allocating direct financial assistance, inviting United Nations mechanisms to undertake country missions, allowing human rights defenders and civil society to participate in the framing of policies and legislation, and efforts to combat impunity.

In 2010, Baden-Württemberg’s Higher Administrative Court in Mannheim overruled a local farmer’s objection to the construction of the EPS.