▾

External sources (not reviewed)

especially the Pacific island countries; and (c) promoting substantial cooperation among disaster-prone countries in prevention, preparedness and post-disaster reconstruction.

intended for the General Assembly to pursue legal or juridical coordination among different legal instruments; (f) bear in mind differing characteristics and needs of different regions of the world; (g) contribute to the annual debate of the General Assembly; and (h) provide an integrated stance of the three pillars of sustainable development.

Plan in Jordan or the NPP in the Philippines where the World Bank was objecting to the support provided or offered by CAP in addition to what was already being done by the Bank.

category 2 institutes and centres to participate in the Director-General’s consultations on the C/4 and the C/5 documents, the modalities for the operation of the sunset clause, the possible financial and legal liabilities of UNESCO for non-performing category 2 centres or those that lose their financial support, the cost and financial implications of engagement with such centres, the reasons for specific allocations (for INRULED), the cost and staff time involved in the proposed mapping exercises and feasibility studies, the proposed staff exchanges, the use of the UNESCO logo and the need for regular review of the agreements concluded regarding category 2 centres.

of funds under a single system and transparent management; the design of mechanisms to improve the effectiveness, coverage and impact of the current social security net; and the expansion and improvement of the efficiency and quality of basic health services.

for in-kind services between agencies; improving transparency in reporting; project implementation approaches; management and accounting of UNEP/CAP activities; and determination of relevant key performance indicators.

of its meetings jointly with the other expert groups to address such matters, as agreed by the Working Group at the forty-ninth session of the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee in February 2012 (A/AC.105/1001, annex IV, para. 16).

both countries coasts, although there are other factors that can modify this, including the lengths of the relevant coastlines, the distance of the various mainland and island coastlines from each other, as well as the number of different island features owned by the various parties to the dispute.

the Delegation of the Czech Republic supports the proposal to amend the third sentence of paragraph (4) as follows: “If, after receiving such a referral, the appointing authority or the Secretary-General of the PCA finds that the arbitral tribunal’s determination of fees and expenses is manifestly excessive, taking into account the arbitral tribunal’s proposal (and any adjustment thereto) under paragraph 3 or, to the extent that the determination of fees and expenses is inconsistent with the proposal, finds that the determination does not satisfy paragraph 1, the appointing authority or the Secretary-General of the PCA shall make any necessary adjustments to the arbitral tribunal’s determination, which shall be binding upon the arbitral tribunal.