▾

External sources (not reviewed)

As well, a message wasdelivered [...][...]

The expression “may, however, be included” reflects the optional nature of this divergent practice, whereas the final qualification “if no contracting State or contracting organization is opposed in a particular case” safeguards the application of the principle established in paragraph 1 should any one contracting State or contracting organization be opposed to that inclusion.

Similarly, the formulation “relations between States under a treaty”, found in article 1, is drawn from article 2, subparagraph (c), of the Vienna Convention, and places the focus on the relations existing under the treaty regime in question, thereby making it possible to distinguish the treaty relations between States, which are included within the scope of the draft articles, from the relations between States and international organization or between international organizations arising under the same treaty, which are excluded from the scope of the articles.

[...] explicitly uponthewording and approach [...]

[...] [...] reflected in the wording of priorities [...][...]

[...] [...] interpretations, lexicographical and material, [...][...]

[...] [...] competence shouldbe worded similarly as [...]

A live-in worker who is dismissed can find herself from one moment to the next in the street with no income, legal residence status, family support network, return air ticket or right to seek another job.

Recalling the wording he had proposed at the Committee’s previous meeting on the draft general comment, he said that in the first sentence of the paragraph, theword “uncensored” should be replaced with the word “unhindered” and the phrase “in a democratic society”, with the phrase “in any society”; following the latter phrase, a new sentence should be inserted which would read: “It constitutes a foundation of democratic society”.

But when Camila realized she was doing too much fundraising and not enough working with the children themselves, she stepped down and in 1996 established Kids Company.

[...] [...] also to present my Government’s protest, in [...]

On the basis of a review of the evidence in the Group’s archives (which is not substantively contradicted by documentation subsequently provided by Mr. Ngezayo), the Group concludes that there was sufficient evidence, including from FPJC sources, to indicate that Mr. Ngezayo was indeed in contact with FPJC, but not to present him as a political leader of that group, an overstatement the Group hereby acknowledges and regrets.

Attention was also drawn to the provisions of section VI of General Assembly resolution 45/248 B, in which the Assembly reaffirmed that the Fifth Committee was the appropriate Main Committee of the Assembly entrusted with responsibilities for administrative and budgetary matters, and to paragraph 67 of the first report of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions on the proposed programme budget for the biennium 2000-2001, in which it noted that the use of the phrase “within existing resources” or similar language in resolutions had a negative impact on the implementation of activities; therefore, every effort should be made to avoid the use of that phrase in resolutions and decisions.

She furthermore suggested simpler, more elegant language for the paragraph, particularly with regard to the phrase “The Covenant embraces” in the second sentence and the word “corollary” in the penultimate sentence; as the latter sentence was currently drafted, it was unclear whether the public had a right to receive information from journalists or the Government, and the public was represented as less important than professional journalists.

Instances of such transformation are most visible when media reports calling for theresignation ofGovernment Ministers and issues of public concern are published.

[...] [...] departure from thewording of the OECD Model [...][...]

[...] position and agreed on wording.

The Thai side had a new cochair Vasin Teeravechyan, a soft-spoken retired diplomat.

However, the language in subparagraphs (i) and (ii) provides flexibility on this point: first, for procuring entities in States in which acceptance of tender securities not issued in the enacting State would be a violation of law; and secondly, in domestic procurement where the procuring entity stipulated in the solicitation documents in accordance with paragraph (1)(b) that a tender security must be issued by an issuer in the enacting State.

In addition, a message was delivered by Denise Coghlan on behalf of the Nobel Peace Prize co-laureates the International Campaign to Ban Landmines and Jody Williams.

OHCHR required only very general guidelines to be able to continue with its work, and although no agreement had been reached thus far, she hoped that delegations would continue to work constructively on that issue and find a compromise that addressed delegations’ genuine concerns while sending a clear signal of support for the very important work of OHCHR.

One member commented thatthewording of thedraft decision proposed [...][...]

[...] [...] proceedings and the resignationof the tribunal [...][...]

The Government of the United States and the indigenous peoples concerned are urged to review the language of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act in order to ensure its consistency with that of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, specifically in relation to: the right of indigenous peoples to self-determination, particularly to maintain and develop their political, economic and social systems or institutions of self-government; to determine their own identity or membership in accordance with their customs and to be secure in the enjoyment of their own means of subsistence and development, or for just and fair redress for its impairment; to denounce the policy of “extinguishment” of Alaska Native aboriginal hunting and fishing rights; and to address the outstanding issue of transfer of lands to traditional institutions of the Alaska Native people.

Such a radical remark is qualified, however, by the use of the expression “as such”: while the Court does not consider itself bound by the unilateral interpretation proposed by Romania, that does not preclude the unilateral interpretation from having an effect as a means of proof or a piece of information that might corroborate the Court’s interpretation “in accordance with Article 31 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties”.

We still believe that the international community must play its rightful and obligatory role by taking the necessary action to halt all illegal measures taken by Israel in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem.

The preservation of the names of the authors of these apothegms, and of those who took part in the discussions, transactions, and disputations renders the Talmud the most important, and in many respects the only, source for the period of which it is the product.

[...] [...] dismissals; (b)tworesignations;(c)four various [...][...]

In that message, Prime Minister Hatoyama urged all parties to the Treaty to bridge their differences in order to pave the way for a world without nuclear weapons in which atomic energy was used only for peaceful purposes.