▾

External sources (not reviewed)

[...] because one of the illustrative maps included [...] [...]

[...] [...] written and reasoned responses regarding [...]

[...] information and explanatory texts, while white areas are for reporting purposes and [...] [...]

Within these strict and narrow time frames, the Unit is required to review the receivability of requests for management evaluation and, where requests are determined to be not receivable, to draft a reasoned response to staff members setting out the legal grounds for such determination, a task often requiring extensive legal research.

When such a descriptive formulation exists, consideration may be given to subsuming earlier agenda items on the same subject under the descriptive formulation.

[...] for each country, descriptive statistics, and [...]

Programmable printing from keyboard or from PC (through the free Dinitools.net software) of 30 print formats linkable to various functions (Print key, Input weigh, Output weigh, Single weigh, Partial total, General total, Grand total, Customer total, Article total, etc.); each print format can contain 2048 positions which may be direct ASCII codes or preset print blocks (i.e. Company name, weigh and lot progressive, net weight, memory storage number, customer description, article description, date and time, etc.).

[...] provides insight into how complex practical issues should be resolved and illustrative examples [...]

This section describes an illustrative process of deployment [...]

[...] information and explanatory texts and the white areas are for reporting purposes and must [...] [...]

[...] [...] populated with illustrative numbers, glossary, annexes and list of references

[...] [...] analytical uses which are currently covered by the illustrative list of laboratory [...] [...]

[...] [...] centre of gravity coordinates, etc.).

[...] [...] also to adopt an illustrative list of laboratory uses.

[...] [...] transmit herewith descriptive and tabulated accounts [...] [...]

[...] [...] corresponding explanatory notes at their [...]

[...] [...] left out in the explanatory notes to the [...]

The Committee had before it two information notes entitled “Importance of disaster risk reduction in achieving the Millennium Development Goals” (E/ESCAP/CDR(2)/INF/4) and “Addressing disaster risk reduction and development through improved data on disasters” (E/ESCAP/CDR(2)/INF/5).

A State or an international organization may formulate an interpretative declaration unless the interpretative declaration is prohibited by the treaty or is incompatible with a peremptory norm of general international law.

If a unilateral statement which purports to be an interpretative declaration is in fact a reservation, its permissibility must be assessed in accordance with the provisions of guidelines 3.1 to 3.1.13.

As for interpretative declarations, although it was appropriate that the regime for reservations should not simply be transposed to them, it would be useful for the two regimes to be substantially aligned with regard to interpretative declarations that could be recharacterized as reservations in the light of the definition of “reservation” in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

In that context, he called on the nuclear-weapon States that had ratified the Additional Protocol II to the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean (Treaty of Tlatelolco) with reservations and unilateral interpretative declarations to withdraw them; the commitment represented by nuclear-weaponfree zones should not be plagued by uncertainty regarding the presence, use or threat of use of nuclear weapons in the regions concerned.

[...] [...] in the law’s explanatory notes, according to which: […] the uniqueness of the Israeli [...] [...]

[...] experimental sessions should be based on certain key principles, including: that participation would be on a voluntary basis, particularly as concerns States Parties that would be the subject of a national focus; that the overarching purpose of each session would be to seek cooperative means to support implementation; and, that there would be no report produced attributing views [...] [...]

In describing the potential of MOST, the Council agreed that MOST relies on, inter alia: being an international platform that mobilizes Member State’s support for social sciences in their countries; being a resource that in a highly visible way creates demand and awareness in policymakers of their need for social science research in policy formulation; having the responsibility to promote and support capacity-building initiatives, particularly on systemic issues that require government action; the illustration of the credibility and relevance of MOST’s objectives by working through a select number of globally-significant social transformations, in accordance with Main Lines of Action 2 and 3 in Major Programme III on Social and Human Sciences of 36 C/5; and, encouraging participatory processes, engaging with civil society, and creating greater sensitivity to the need for social sciences.

[...] [...] or relapse into, violence, given the changing nature of conflicts and the security-development nexus, as well [...] [...]

Hungary underlined that Norway’s cooperation with the universal periodic review, and its transparency and openness during the preparation and the review process, could serve as a model to other countries, and highly appreciated its voluntary commitment to provide information annually on the implementation of the recommendations it accepted.

[...] have been proven to make a difference in terms of transparency include: supporting local radio stations in vernacular languages, both as a means to reinforce the voice of local communities (by providing channels for conveying priorities [...] [...]