▾

External sources (not reviewed)

[...] [...] Council recommended that an oath of office specially suited to their duties be developed for judges of the Tribunals (see [...]

[...] to prepare a draft judicial oath for consideration [...]

The affidavit by Mr. Al Hassane A. Kaba [...] [...]

The organization aims to contribute to the education of young people through a value system based on the scout promise and law and to help build a better world where people are self-fulfilled as individuals and play a constructive role in society.

In cases where sworn affidavits were taken, [...]

[...] [...] why they took the R-word pledge and why they [...]

[...] passionate fans taking the R-word pledge all over the world.

Have you taken the R-word pledge because [...]

Everyone takes the R-word pledge for a reason [...]

In 2010, 90 cases of ill treatment with regard to the treatment of Palestinian children in Israeli detention were documented by the United Nations and its partners, including through the sworn affidavits of children.

The campaign continues because passionate supporters have created communities of respect, and those stories need to be shared to help make a lasting impact, because taking the R-word pledge is not just about a word – it’s about people.

And, as the word “likewise” in [...] [...]

[...] [...] except Rules 1 (Oath or Affirmation), [...] [...]

In the context of international efforts for counter-piracy and the participation of military personnel in the operations referred to in article 4, para. 13 of this decree, and also in conjunction with the European Union Joint Action 2008/851/PESC of the Council, of 10 November 2008, and awaiting the approval of the guidelines of the Maritime Safety Committee of the United Nations within the International Maritime Organization (IMO), it is authorized — whereas the detachments referred to in para. 1, are not established — and in any case within the limits established in paras. 5, 5-bis, 5-ter, the employment of “sworn guards”, authorized under articles 133 and 134 of the Unified law text on Public Security, approved with Royal Decree 18 of June 1931, No. 773, on board merchant ships flagged in Italy transiting in international waters referred to in para. 1, for the protection of the said ships.

[...] [...] the Jewish loyalty oath instituted by the [...] [...]

[...] [...] statutory declaration made by a worker in [...] [...]

[...] [...] any case where an oath, affirmation or [...] [...]

A few participants, however pointed to a danger that the term “quality education” tended to become too broad complicating any assessment of outcomes or measurement of results, and that an agreed-to definition was warranted.

It was also suggested that FAO should undertake technical work in the following five priority areas to assist States and RFMOs implement resolutions 61/105 and 64/72 and the FAO Guidelines: (i) improving and expanding application of the criteria for the identification of VMEs beyond corals, sponges, seamounts and hydrothermal vents; (ii) developing guidance on impact mitigation measures and best practices for developing and applying encounter protocols relevant to VMEs, particularly by RFMOs; (iii) developing guidance on what and how information should be collected to implement measures for managing fishery impacts on VMEs; (iv) defining certain terms that could clarify implementation of the FAO Guidelines; and (v) developing guidance on best practices for conducting assessments.

After discussion, the Working Group agreed that the questions for further consideration on that matter would include (A/CN.9/717, para. 143): (i) whether a provision on protection of the integrity of the arbitral process should be in the form of a general formulation or should contain specific instances that were meant to be specifically addressed; (ii) the interplay between the protection of the integrity of the arbitral process and the provisions in the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules already dealing with that issue; and (iii) how to determine the threshold for a limitation to transparency based on the ground of the need to protect integrity of the arbitral process.