▾

External sources (not reviewed)

reach agreement either on determining the cut-off date or on the policy relating to second-stage conversions.

sector phase-out for controlled substances, the calculation of closure costs, synchronization of the HCFC production and consumption phase-out, the need for incentives for early closure and disincentives for late closure of HCFC facilities, the need for robust monitoring, issues related to production sector cut-off dates and swing plants and whether further information about clean development mechanism processes was needed.

care of seafarers and other persons who have been subjected to acts of piracy.

of issues, there was still some difference of opinion concerning the inclusion of swing plants.

for different aspects of the project, and it had not been possible to reach agreement at the current Meeting.

financing HCFC phase-out, the Executive Committee invited bilateral and implementing agencies to prepare and submit project proposals to the Secretariat for certain HCFC uses so that the Executive Committee could choose those projects that best demonstrated alternative technologies and facilitated the collection of accurate data on incremental capital cost and incremental operating costs or savings, as well as other data relevant to the application of the technology, on the understanding that the quantity of HCFCs to be phased out under those projects would be deducted from the starting point for sustained aggregate reductions in eligible consumption as set by the HPMP.

the relevant cost considerations surrounding the financing of HCFC phase-out.

in stage I of the HPMP, the cost-effectiveness of the projects and the lack of ODP reductions associated with the technical assistance component for systems houses were successfully resolved, and it was agreed that the ODP reduction component could be extended to an additional 5 per cent in 2016.

actions required by Article 5 countries to meet compliance obligations after 2010 provided an indication that funding support for institutional strengthening would likely be needed after 2010, and that possible funding arrangements and levels for institutional strengthening support beyond 2010 would have to be examined, especially in light of decision XIX/6 of the Nineteenth Meeting of the Parties, which imposed new obligations with respect to accelerated HCFC phase-out.

taking into account the reporting procedures and obligations under each Rio Convention.

of human rights and transitional justice and the strengthening of the overall justice system of Timor-Leste.

ODS tonnes and above would be eligible for US $400,000 for investment preparation and that funds for HPMP preparation as per paragraph 92(b)(i)-(iii) would be considered on an individual basis.

revised CAP budget at an amount of US $8,243,090 plus agency support costs of 8 per cent, amounting to US $659,447, representing a 3 per cent increase on the 2007 budget (decision 53/21).

of discount to be applied to the HPMP preparation costs of those countries that had already received funding for HCFC surveys; the level of project preparation funding for countries that had reported zero HCFC consumption; the possibility of increased funding for those countries that might revise their reported HCFC consumption from zero to a higher level; and the proposed funding structure for the preparation of investment activities for those countries with manufacturing capabilities involving HCFCs.

information and experience on the scientific, technical and cultural aspects of sustainable energy development, including renewable energy.

human rights and transitional justice, and of the overall justice system of Timor-Leste.