▾

External sources (not reviewed)

of the Framework Convention to report, through the Secretary-General, to the Assembly at its sixty-fifth session on the work of the Conference of the Parties (resolution 64/73).

of GOOS includes emerging essential climate variables on ocean chemistry and ecosystems and noted the relevance of these variables in tracking the impacts of climate change and acidification on ocean ecosystem services.

duplication and conflicts but also to find possible synergies where feasible.

by the ARPEL Climate Change Working Group since its creation in 1999, the secretariat of the Framework Convention accepted ARPEL as an official observer to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol and its subsidiary bodies, during the tenth Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in December 2004 in Buenos Aires; (b) ARPEL report on the contribution of the oil and gas industry to greenhouse gas emissions reduction in Latin America and the Caribbean was presented at the same Conference; (c) participation of ARPEL at the eleventh Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in November and December 2005 in Montreal, Canada.

and to related international processes, with a view to informing deliberation on the follow-up to 35 C/Resolution 36 by the General Conference at its 36th session” and to invite COMEST “to continue to work on the desirability of an ethical framework for climate change policies”.

and the stipulation of the Convention (art. 2) that climate action is to enable economic development in a sustainable way.

first Executive Committee meeting of 2013 to decide on the date of the second meeting for that year, to avoid conflicting dates for the various meetings.

and mobilize financial resources or under the General Assembly to respond to the development challenges.

Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (see annex).

for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation take full account of the holistic nature of sustainable forest management.

had been delivered by the phase-out of ozone-depleting substances and the growing urgency of the climate change threat.

climate change, recalls the provisions of the UNFCCC, including the acknowledgement that the global nature of climate change calls for the widest possible cooperation by all countries and their participation in an effective and appropriate international response, in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities and their social and economic conditions, and invites the relevant organs of the United Nations, as appropriate and within their respective mandates to intensify their efforts in considering and addressing climate change, including its possible security implications.

that the global nature of climate change calls for the widest possible cooperation by all countries and their participation in an effective and appropriate international response, in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities and their social and economic conditions.

change, and the primary forum for considering the risks associated with and the actions needed to address climate change, in accordance with the principles enshrined in the Convention.

and the United Nations Development Programme to help organize the seminar, informed by the best available science, including the assessment reports and special reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

under the auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

urged developed countries to undertake ambitious commitments in line with the Kyoto Protocol in subsequent commitment periods and to ensure that there was no conflict between the first and subsequent commitment periods.

Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action (AWG-LCA) and the Ad-hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG-KP).

their individual mandates, concerned by the negative impacts that loss of biodiversity, desertification, land degradation and climate change have on each other, and recognizing the potential benefits of complementarities in addressing these problems in a mutually supportive manner with a view to achieving the objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity

of common but differentiated responsibilities, particularly in the context of the Conference of the Parties and of the Meetings of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol;7 7.

of the United States, as well as actions from the high-emitting developing countries, which would be measured, reported and verified.