▾

External sources (not reviewed)

[...] [...] the guards: even though the country was [...] [...]

(d) A “totality of circumstances” approach should not be precluded in appropriate cases where, for example, there may have been an opportunistic change of location of the registered office of a company in order to establish COMI (as a result of e.g. insider exploitation, untoward manipulation, overt thwarting of third-party expectations, biased activity or motivation).

[...] [...] its vertical direction to be same as that of the digital level meter, then insert the [...] [...]

The stripped data is then modified according to the Manipulation property, [...]

[...] [...] primitive, State-condoned and blatant abuses of human rights [...] [...]

[...] [...] manipulating the United Nations in accordance with geopolitical and economic interests, flagrantly violating Security [...]

While conceding that the impact on the vertical relationship, namely how international criminal jurisdiction had been affected, was very clear, the Special Rapporteur noted such was not the case with respect to the quite distinct and separate horizontal relationship involving interactions between sovereign States and their national criminal jurisdictions.

The view was expressed that while efforts had been made at all levels to address both vertical and horizontal proliferation as well, the framework did not cover all aspects of the concept in its entirety.

The Assistant Director-General for Africa also gave an overview of UNESCO’s cooperation with Africa since NEPAD was launched as a programme of the African Union.

[...] [...] original sources (though vertical transport [...]

Even though governments still have [...] [...]

It was indicated by the Secretariat that some options could be pursued, such as the non-publication in document C/5 Approved of the context maps which list the partners involved in the execution of each programme and to place this information instead online; furthermore, the separate publication of the Director-General’s introduction and the introductions to each major programme combined could provide a handy overview on the essence of UNESCO’s priorities, orientations and actions for a biennial period, especially for national decision-makers.

[...] [...] inciting and condoning acts of terrorism [...] [...]

(b) To take persistent, determined and effective measures to have all allegations of torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment investigated promptly, effectively and impartially by an independent, competent domestic authority, as well as whenever there is reasonable ground to believe that such an act has been committed; to hold persons who encourage, order, tolerate or perpetrate such acts responsible, to have them brought to justice and punished in a manner commensurate with the gravity of the offence, including the officials in charge of the place of detention where the prohibited act is found to have been committed; and to take note, in this respect, of the Principles on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the updated set of principles for the protection of human rights through action to combat impunity as a useful tool in efforts to prevent and combat torture

During this session, the SHS and SC Commissions examined the resolution proposed in document 35 C/COM SC/DR.1 (submitted by: Austria, Belgium, Plurinational State of Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Congo, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Finland, Iceland, Libya, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, New Zealand, Netherlands, Norway, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Poland, Portugal, Samoa, Senegal, Slovenia, Sweden, Tuvalu, Uruguay; co-sponsored by: Barbados, Costa Rica, Germany, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Monaco, Pakistan, Solomon Islands, Suriname, and Zambia), requesting the Director-General to strengthen UNESCO’s specialized capacity on climate change, building upon UNESCO’s unique interdisciplinary profile.

For Canada, those covered the terminal phase-out management plan for ODS in the refrigeration and air-conditioning sector in Saint Lucia and the terminal phase-out management plan for Annex A Group I substances in Uruguay; for Italy, the umbrella project for terminal phase-out of ODS in the solvent sector in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the phase-out of methyl bromide as a soil fumigant in Morocco, and the terminal CTC phase-out project in Serbia; and for Spain, the phase-out of methyl bromide in horticulture in Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.

It was suggested that the States Parties reflect on how they can enable the necessary in-depth analysis and discussion of the requests in order to ensure that high quality requests continue to be the norm.

[...] repeatedly stated that, despite ongoing political [...] [...]