▾

External sources (not reviewed)

suffer any injury as a result of such error; and (c) for violating obligations of courtesy, even though the Dispute Tribunal found that the contested administrative decision was lawful.

weight of the interests at stake in a case: the more important the case in terms of consequences for the parties, the more precise and exacting the requirements of keeping the official record of the trial and the court’s judgment.

between naval States, the Somali authorities and the host State for the transfer of suspects; the training of Somali judges, prosecutors and other legal professionals, and possible recruitment of international experts; the need to find suitable premises, to construct or refurbish courtrooms and detention facilities, and to put security arrangements in place; and the need to ensure that sufficient prison capacity to international standards is available in Somalia.

for requesting observer status which, they considered, should be authorized by the members of the Committee on the basis of criteria which should be applied strictly so as to ensure equal treatment of all States, and to avoid an increase in such requests as well as the risk of pressure on members of the Committee during their discussions.

and conditions that are fully disclosed to participating suppliers or contractors; they are also designed to ensure a minimum level of transparency and to facilitate the exercise by a supplier or contractor that has not been pre-qualified of its right to challenge its disqualification.

be decided upon by the Chair in consultation with the Bureau of the seminar.

targeting aid to gender, human rights and protecting the environment, and combating corruption).

the Committee had decided that the present Meeting would be the last at which MDI projects would be considered, so any further submission of requests would miss that deadline.

Assembly with a view to concentrating work on the right to development in Geneva, where the High Commissioner for Human Rights and relevant mandates conducted their work.

whether States would be prepared to start anew.

of uniformity in cooperation between agencies, legal hindrances to release confidential data, restrictions on the admissibility of evidence deriving from cooperation efforts and the risk that information exchanged is impaired or compromised by the competition authority providing it are just a few.

Committee, and the particular situation of the countries concerned.

of non-military vessels, endowing them with investigative authority; increase the number of participants in criminal cases to include individuals providing legal assistance to suspected pirates; and modify procedural deadlines for the investigation of crimes of piracy.

and that this was the main cause of the delay of the civil proceedings.

of past, incumbent and future Chairs to better sustain the Treaty’s work during and between meetings, and bolstering the administrative capacity of the review process with a small support unit.

of its implications, as the success of the Doha Review Conference would depend to a great extent on the procedures governing the negotiations.

of extraordinary meetings; (b) form a Chairs’ Circle of past, incumbent and future Chairs to better sustain the Treaty’s work during and between meetings; and (c) bolster the administrative capacity of the review process with a small support unit.