▾

External sources (not reviewed)

[...] inconsistencies and contradictions, with the adoption [...]

[...] [...] particular, the contradictionsbetweenforest [...][...]

No scheme will be successfully implemented, however, unless there is a central government body that has the necessary authority and resources to manage energy security and reconcile competing bureaucratic and corporate interests.

(A) Subject to any exercise by the Board of the powers conferred by Bye-laws 128 to 130, the management of the business of the Company shall be vested in the Board who, in addition to the powers and authorities by these Bye-laws expressly conferred upon it, may exercise all such powers and do all such acts and things as may be exercised or done or approved by the Company and are not hereby or by the Statutes expressly directed or required to be exercised or done by the Company in general meeting, but subject nevertheless to the provisions of the Statutes and of these Bye-laws and to any regulations from time to time made by the Company in general meeting not being inconsistent with such provisions of these Bye-laws, provided that no regulation so made shall invalidate any prior act of the Board which would have been valid if such regulation had not been made.

[...] statehood ascontradictory to orincompatible [...][...]

The consequences of the nullity of an invalid reservation gave rise to two conflictingtheses, the first being the thesis of severability, according to which the author of an invalid reservation was bound by the treaty without the benefit of its reservation, and the second being the thesis of “pure consensualism”, according to which the invalidity of the reservation excluded the author from the circle of States parties, the reservation being a sine qua non for the author’s consent to be bound by the treaty.

[...] [...] and practice is contradictory.

However, UNESCO will find it difficult to address this issue effectively if it is also asked to undertake the complex task of leading the development of an anti-doping convention for competitive sport.

It further notes that it isincongruous that the author has been able to retain counsel for the proceedings before the Committee but not to pursue available and effective domestic remedies.

[...] [...] tradeoffs and contradictions are mounting, [...][...]

[...] [...] positionsandambivalence,reengage on [...][...]

[...] complainant contradicted herself on [...]

[...] [...] reconciling conflicting arguments before [...]

[...] [...] unproven and contradictory, itwould be [...][...]

In preparing this report we have been mindful of theconflicting challenges of governance reporting – the objective on the one hand of keeping the report concise and the aim on the other of providing a full and complete report.

[...] [...] developmentof contradictory standards between [...][...]

It was noted that green growth could be an important strategy, although it could be slow due to conflicts between benefits and the threats posed by rapid growth and industrialization.

Consequently, the formal validity of an interpretative declaration is not linked to observance of a specific form or procedure.296 The rules governing the form and communication of reservations cannot then be purely and simply transposed to simple interpretative declarations, which may be formulated orally, and it would thus be paradoxical to insist that they be formally communicated to the other States or international organizations concerned.

[...] and sometimes contradictory with each level [...]

In addition, the Panel is unable to reconcile the SAF statement that it has not transferred ammunition to its forces in Darfur with the presence of ammunition cartridges clearly marked as having been produced in 2009 on a site under constant military supervision in Northern Darfur (sample 6 in table 3 and Box 1 above).

[...] the inevitablecontradictions of the neoliberal [...][...]

[...] [...] contractors,thus contradicting thefundamental [...]

The HRCM continues to face a number of challenges in carrying out its mandate including: tension between certain aspects of Shari’ah law and international human rights law; lack of an established system under which HRCM is automatically consulted on new legislation impacting on human rights; tendency for government departments to ignore the Commission’s input and opinions; legal uncertainty as to whether HRCM can appear in court on behalf of victims, or even submit opinions to the courts; and very low take-up of NPM recommendations.

Finally, as on any other continent, but more so, the root causes of conflict in Africa are political and socialantitheses,violations of human rights, absolute poverty and, very often, foreign interference and aggression, which must be addressed in a coherent and comprehensive manner.

With regard to the second complainant, the Migration Court stated, inter alia, that she has not been able to prove her story using documents or other evidence, although the information she has given was coherent and did not conflict with known facts.

[...] [...] particular to acontradiction between paragraphs [...][...]

Innovative models of collection and disposal management, including those that involve the private sector through concession contracts, can be explored, but careful consideration must be given to the inclusion of provisions on the various segments of the waste management chain to avoid such inconsistencies as giving waste disposal companies incentives to receive large volumes of waste.