▾

External sources (not reviewed)

[...] neither, under a narrow definition, are cell lines [...] [...]

[...] course of action, both narrow and realistic, that [...] [...]

[...] [...] to clarify the meaning of the expression “reservation expressly authorized by the treaty”, which should be interpreted restrictively.

[...] [...] legislation and its narrow interpretation [...]

[...] [...] treaty: that is the sense of the restrictive [...] [...]

4) During the actual protest, the normal preoccupation about law and order by State agents should, as far as possible, give way to the narrower focus of preserving the peace, and protecting people and property against harm.

[...] [...] the Bible) and the Halakah in the more restricted sense became the [...] [...]

However, the effect of the rejection may properly, in the view of the Court, be said to render the reservations non-opposable to the United Kingdom.

While other formulations specifying all the phases of assistance were considered, the Commission opted for the present, more economical, phrasing, without intending to favour a strict interpretation that would render the provision applicable only to the response phase of disaster assistance activities.

This terminology is also the result of a compromise between a narrower (first part of the sentence) and a broader (second part of the sentence) view of the cultural heritage to be protected in terms of State responsibility.

Not only may a narrow understanding of [...] [...]

[...] [...] to be interpreted narrowly and that therefore, [...] [...]

[...] [...] paragraph should be interpreted narrowly.

The Court first of all recalled that, according to Article 18 EC “the principle of movement for workers must be given a broad interpretation, whereas derogations from the principle must be interpreted strictly”.143 It further recalled that, in line with its own case law, an offence disturbs public order if it creates a genuine and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interest of society.

[...] treats of damages in a narrow sense (along with theft, [...] [...]

[...] [...] religious practise; to narrow down the definition [...] [...]

[...] [...] therefore employed a more narrow definition of decentralization [...] [...]

[...] [...] proceedings” has a narrow technical meaning in [...] [...]

[...] [...] 13.8%), and money supply already approaching the $100 trillion threshold; the narrow money (M1) balance [...] [...]

It was also noted that the Secretariat’s proposal would allow for a narrative explanation by National Ozone Units and a response from the implementing agency concerned.

Broadly speaking, development refers to processes of social change and to projects meant to transform national economies, particularly in former colonies or third world States.1 A narrower conception of international development evolved after the Second World War with the establishment of institutions, policies, disciplinary formations and – most importantly – practices of intervention aimed toward the alleviation of poverty in the third world.2 Although the modern development enterprise found its roots in the same conflict as that which gave birth to the international human rights movement, the two disciplines have largely existed in parallel and, despite their shared goals, have largely remained separate pursuits until recent times.

Formally, the right of access applies primarily to ‘information’ held by public bodies, so the relevance of the more restrictive definition of public information, which is qualified by the notion of legal duties, is unclear.

With respect to new draft article 5 (Duty to cooperate), the Drafting Committee had made the following changes to the Special Rapporteur’s initial proposal, a number of which had also been suggested by members of the Sixth Committee: the reference to civil society, which some had considered overly broad and vague, had been replaced by the narrower term “relevant non-governmental organizations”, and a reference to the International Committee of the Red Cross had been added in recognition of that organization’s vital role in delivering humanitarian assistance.

Given the need for more liberal legislation on abortion to prevent further risks to young women because of the rather narrow interpretation of existing legislation, he urged the State party to speed up action on legislation that had been before the Ministry of Justice for quite some time.

[...] to go beyond a narrow understanding [...] [...]

[...] of the exceptions narrowly.7 However, even with [...] [...]

lastly, and most importantly, the position traditionally taken by ILO reflects a restrictive view of the concept of reservations which is not reflected in the Vienna Conventions or in the present Guide to Practice.

Having said this, I do not consider it an appropriate exercise of my judicial role to examine these arguments in extenso; therefore, on this point, I shall content myself simply with declaring that the Court could have delivered a more intellectually satisfying Opinion, and one with greater relevance as regards the international legal order as it has evolved into its present form, had it not interpreted the scope of the question so restrictively.

This has major implications for intellectual property rights in the strict sense (their creation, ownership and exploitation) and for the wider question of cultural identity and its ownership (e.g. intangible heritage).