▾

External sources (not reviewed)

The Delegation also and noted that Brazil had expressed a reservation in the Committee in general terms but had not made specific proposals at that time.

[...] present chapter refers generally to [...] [...]

After discussion, the Working Group agreed that the questions for further consideration on that matter would include (A/CN.9/717, para. 143): (i) whether a provision on protection of the integrity of the arbitral process should be in the form of a general formulation or should contain specific instances that were meant to be specifically addressed; (ii) the interplay between the protection of the integrity of the arbitral process and the provisions in the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules already dealing with that issue; and (iii) how to determine the threshold for a limitation to transparency based on the ground of the need to protect integrity of the arbitral process.

Target groups supported within the framework of state housing policy include lessees deprived of privatisation rights during the ownership reform, children and young people without parental care, disabled people, elderly people, families with many children, persons released from prison and persons under probation supervision, homeless people, cooperative societies and communities, and specialists dealing with planning and development of residential environment.

Noting this point, as well as the fact that ethical principles in relation to climate change, while explicit or implicit in many existing legal instruments, have not been consolidated or articulated in a single comprehensive statement, the World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST) at its 6th Ordinary Session in 2009 recommended that UNESCO develop an ethical framework of principles in relation to climate change, in order to enable UNESCO Member States, and the international community generally, to address adequately the multidimensional challenge of global climate change.

Considering the importance of advancing multilateral cooperation and building a strong sense of a North-East Asian community among governments and people, the Commission invited all member States to make good use of the significant potential of the Subregional Office as a key platform for initiating and facilitating subregional cooperation.

In order to effectively deter, prevent and suppress threats to maritime security, States require strong infrastructures and up-to-date knowledge, technology, equipment and training, as well as substantial financial, technical and human resources.

[...] [...] mobilized for most activities to [...]

Consequently, it was pointed out that the Special Rapporteur had failed to address the possibility that the procedural issue at hand was not one of invocation of immunity or waiver thereof but rather the absence of immunity in respect of situations in which grave international crimes were committed, although it was also countered by other members that the assertion that there was no immunity for such “core crimes” was abstract and general, and the Commission will have to deal with these matters in greater detail at a later stage.