▾

External sources (not reviewed)

part, to the lack of coordination of relevant State entities.

the transit State was bound by rules of international law that were incumbent only upon the expelling State; on the other, by not specifying whether the obligations it envisaged were imposed on the expelling State, the transit State, or both.

and who should manage implementation; the time required to incorporate each entity’s perspective within the programme based on the particular mandates in relation to gender equality, as well as the clearance processes in each entity; lack of funds for gender mainstreaming initiatives; and a lack of a gender knowledge strategy on gender to identify, centralize and disseminate United Nations system information, tools, guidance, manuals, innovative methodologies and lessons learned.

Headquarters, regional and country levels, and vis-à-vis other partners.

therefore an internationally accepted list of SIDS.

a reservation is established only “if all the contracting States and contracting organizations have accepted it”, by which is meant all the States and international organizations that have already ratified the treaty or do so within the 12-month period following the formulation of the reservation.

and equitable benefit-sharing].

to lie as much with a lack of political will as with uncertainty in the practical steps necessary to respect indigenous peoples‟ rights.

files concerning project implementation could weaken the monitoring of project implementation.

and (b) the absence of a strategic plan that maps out the direction and priorities.

and specification of participants, inclusion of other stakeholders (including from other agencies) and appropriate levels of evaluation.

the United Nations Office to the African Union.

between the use of armed force in international as opposed to noninternational armed conflicts, since in the latter, it needed to be “protracted”, in other words, to cross a certain threshold of intensity.

of the offences laid down by the Penal Code.

the Convention to draw a distinction between acts of torture committed by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or any other person acting in an official capacity, and acts of violence committed by non State actors.

consider whether the explanation provided at paragraphs 73 and 128 of the Guide to Enactment is sufficient or whether the issue should be clarified by additional commentary.

the Committee considers that to sue for damages for offences as serious as those alleged in the present case cannot be considered a substitute for the charges that should be brought by the public prosecutor.16 Moreover, given the vague wording of articles 45 and 46 of the Ordinance and, in the absence of satisfactory information from the State party about their interpretation and actual enforcement, the author’s fears of the consequences of filing a complaint are reasonable.