▾

External sources (not reviewed)

It would mean that the Office would not have the standing, which is so necessary for the operation of an adversarial system, to persuade potential litigants against bringing hopeless cases, to negotiate effective resolutions “at the court door” with management, to help staff avoid the technical legal pitfalls in litigation, to provide “equality of arms” for staff within the overall system or to provide the Internal Justice Council with full information, from a claimant’s perspective, as to the functioning of the system.

[...] [...] interview reports from the panel for presentation to the Field Central Review Bodies, monitoring incumbency rates in the field operations [...]

The Board continues to report the results of audits to the Fund of UNEP in the form of management letters containing detailed observations and recommendations.

[...] [...] not in the business plans would not be reviewed by the Secretariat or placed before the Executive Committee, [...] [...]

[...] Court refused to examine his claims regarding [...]

[...] [...] of the Programme of Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States (A/64/278), and to submit its independent views and perspectives on United Nations support for small island developing States to the Council.

[...] [...] through the reporting lines for consideration by the ERM committee; (f) [...] [...]

At the fifteenth session, the Commission decided to adopt a revised text of the draft regulations as its recommendation to the Council, noting that the text adopted by the Commission had been fully aligned with the adjustments to the text of the draft regulations on polymetallic sulphides agreed by the Council in 2007 and 2008.

[...] [...] consistent with applicable human rights law and with the participation of international [...]

[...] staff assistant to compile pertinent information such as feedback obtained through procurement assistance visits to the field missions, recommendations of the Headquarters Committee on Contracts on cases submitted for review and those of other [...] [...]

Such review, in the frame of a decision regarding a leave to appeal, must be examined on its merits, taking into consideration on one the hand the evidence presented before the first instance judge, and on the other hand the conduct of the trial on the basis of the legal provisions applicable to the case in question.

[...] [...] exceeding the established approval thresholds without submitting the case for review; use of consultants instead of temporary staff [...] [...]

[...] [...] of commenting on the Report before its review by the Review Panels; he/she shall thereafter sign the report signifying that he/she has read it, and shall be given a copy; the original shall then be transmitted to the Bureau of Human Resources Management.

[...] [...] the Meeting of the States Parties or Review Conference preceding the requesting State’s deadline.

[...] [...] in the implementation of the provisions of the quadrennial policy review of operational activities; and (b) a section on the activities and [...]

[...] [...] management (SLM) technologies, including adaptation, submitted through reports to CRIC 9 from affected and developed country Parties, United Nations agencies and intergovernmental organizations, the Global Environment Facility and CSOs accredited to the COP.

[...] [...] that render technical assistance in matters of democratization, governance and human rights protection; and receives and reviews complaints from the public about human rights violations.

If the executive head was the final authority for such review and approval, [...] [...]

On appeal, the District Court, by decision of 30 July 2004, quashed the Minister’s decision and ordered a reconsideration of the author’s application under the regular procedure.

Broadened the audit scope beyond compliance audit and conducted comprehensive audits to cover significant operational and management issues; Identification of system-wide shortcomings, in addition to the local shortcomings, to allow management to produce long-term improvements benefiting the entire Organization; Introduction of improved audit methodology and improved audit processes such as: mandatory audit exit meetings at the completion of each audit to present and discuss major audit observations and recommendations; Provision of draft audit report to the field office at the completion of the audit prior to the audit team leaving the office to secure concurrence on factual information and recommendations; Preparation of action plans by the audited office for implementation of the audit recommendations to be submitted to IOS after the completion of the audits.

[...] [...]

Reference is made in paragraph 19 of the document under consideration to contract reform and the harmonization of conditions of service in the field, which were decided at the United Nations [...]

We welcome the proposal contained in the Secretary-General’s report (S/2010/234) to review the implementation of the United Nations strategy for Somalia and are looking forward to the presentation of the results to the Security Council.

[...] highlighted: focus on assistance in curricula review and revision, particularly the introduction of values education and ethical approaches, in accordance with national priorities and Arab needs; “learner-centred” education; improvement of teaching [...] [...]

[...] [...] audit certificates pursuant to decisions 18 and 48 of the Council and audit certificates pursuant to a decision taken by the Governing Council at its forty-ninth session in September 2003, [...] [...]

[...] [...] recommendations to the Council and the Assembly on the implementation by the Authority of article 82, paragraph 4, of the Convention.

[...] [...] Independent Panel on Safety and Security of United Nations Personnel and Premises Worldwide and the submission of the response of the United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination to the recommendations [...]