▾

External sources (not reviewed)

If the person against whom an application has been filed refuses to provide proof or explanation, such behaviour is considered as admission of discrimination.

The Principles and Guidelines do not endorse any specific model but encourage States to guarantee the basic right to legal aid of persons detained, arresteda or imprisoned, suspectedbor accused of, or charged with a criminal offence, while expanding legal aid to include others who come into contact with the criminal justice system and diversifying legal aid delivery schemes.

[...] concerned at credible reports that such acts [...][...]

[...] next periodic reportfurther statistics [...][...]

For those that do, it is possible to pursue allegations of war crimes in relation to those who acted on behalf of either Israel or Hamas during Operation Cast Lead, to arrest, indict, prosecute, and punish.

On the trial or hearing of any action or other proceedings for the recovery of any money due for any call, it shall be sufficient to prove that the name of the member suedis entered in the register as the holder, or one of the holders, of the shares in respect of which such debt accrued, that the resolution making the call is duly recorded in the minute book, and that notice of such call was duly given to the membersued,in pursuance of these Articles; and it shall not be necessary to prove the appointment of the Directors who made such call, nor any other matters whatsoever, but the proof of the matters aforesaid shall be conclusive evidence of the debt.

(b) Enabling children who are detained, arrested, suspected or accused of, or charged with a criminal offence to contact their parents or guardians at once and prohibiting any interviewing of a child in the absence of his or her lawyer or other legal aid provider, and parent or guardian when available, in the best interests of the child;(c) Ensuring the right of the child to have the matter determined in the

[...] [...] proceedings against IFAD before the Administrative Tribunal of theInternational Labour Organization [...][...]

In addition, administrative charges could be brought against the military officials involved in the case with the Office of the Ombudsman, which could result in the removal from office or immediate suspension of the officials even while the case is pending.

[...] [...] aliens without charge ortrial were [...]

[...] information,charge or indictment for any offence other than treason it is proved that the accused is not guilty of that offence but the allegations in the information, charge or indictment amount to or include, whether expressly or by implication, an allegation of another offence falling within the jurisdiction of the court of trial, he may be found guilty of that other offence or of an offence of which he could be found guiltyon aninformation,charge or indictment specifically charging that other offence.

(f) Compile relevant and comprehensive statistics as soon as possible on complaints, inquiries, legal proceedings, convictions and sentences passed in cases of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.

If the person charged desires to make a statement in reply, the usual caution should be administered.

[...] [...] identify, bring inand report suspects tocompetent [...][...]

This position has been reiterated on a number of occasions when the Secretariat received complaints about the destruction of cultural property.

[...] [...] hatred, anti-Semitism or other forms [...]

The complaint chargesUCBH,its former CEO and Chairman, Thomas Wu, and its former Chief Credit Officer, Ebrahim Shabudin, with violating federal securities by issuing materially inaccurate financial statements to the investing public.

Lastly, article10 of the Constitution lays down the essential guarantees offered by the criminal justice system in terms of procedure and protection of the fundamental rights of persons in case of arrest, charge or deprivation of liberty.

Staff members have also lodged complaints which are pending before the UNESCO Appeal Board or the International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal.

[...] [...] lead to their incrimination, but also constitutes [...]

[...] of the kindof accused products and [...][...]

Indeed, international courts have the authority to charge such individuals with international crimes, to bring them to trial and, if they are convicted, to order that they serve sentences of imprisonment.

With regard to the case againstSaif Al-Islam Al-Qadhafi, we are following with great interest the development of the admissibility challenge that has been brought before the Court, which should be decided upon soon by a chamber of the Court.

The most central of these were: (i) her return to Pakistan to participate in politics; (ii) free and fair elections in 2007; (iii) Musharraf’s resignation from the Army; (iv) amnesty in the criminal cases against her and her husband, Asif Ali Zardari; and (v) the elimination of the ban on third terms for former prime ministers, which would impede her from holding that office again.

In particular, differences in definitions (for example, the term “official charge” might be understood to mean “all persons officially prosecuted” but also “persons indicted”) mean that the degree to which data are comparable depends heavily on the nature of the criminal justice system and methods used to record statistics.

[...] [...] DegradingTreatment orPunishment, and had taken decisions on 16 individual complaints.