▾

External sources (not reviewed)

We must not allow those resources to be patented by transnational companies, nor should we allow the selfishness of some nations to prevent us from reaching important agreements on this issue.

The view was expressed that the definition and delimitation of outer space would also enable the effective application of the principles of the freedom of use of outer space and of non-appropriation of outer space.

Similarly, the common good of Mother Earth and humanity requires that we conceive of the Earth as a living being worthy of dignity and not to be appropriated by any individual or to be commercialized or to be systematically afflicted by any production model.

Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit was part of outer space, that it was not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation or by any other means, including by repeated use, and that its utilization was governed by the Outer Space Treaty and ITU treaties.

[...] [...] orbital positions, in accordance with the principles [...] [...]

[...] [...] those who wish to appropriate the vast oil resources of the Libyan people.

The view was expressed that the establishment of a definition and delimitation of outer space would create certainty in the sovereignty of States over their airspace and would also enable the effective application of the principles of the freedom of use of outer space and of non-appropriation of outer space.

According to its interpretation, China is claiming the entire [...]

For example, under UK patent law, an applicant who does not claim to be the [...]

[...] [...] languages and emphasized that ‘each staff member should be free to use in his/her written communications either English or French, at his or her option’ and that ‘no impediment is to be placed by anyone to this policy’, [...] [...]

Each Council member shall have one vote but it may send as many experts [...]

[...] [...] the gathering of evidence (owing to a breakdown in the legal and social order), the role of the international tribunal is at least clear: to act because the State is unable (or unwilling) to take the matter into its own hands.

CIEFFA shall be at the service of the Member States of UNESCO; which are members of the African Union and possibly other Member States or Associate Members of UNESCO, which, owing to the nature of their educational development and planning needs for girls and/or women, desire to cooperate with the Centre.

In support of these uses, Microsoft may use your information to provide you with more effective customer service, improve the Store or the Website and any related Microsoft products or services, perform statistical analysis, and make the Website easier to use by eliminating the need for you to repeatedly enter the same information or by customizing the Website to your particular preferences or interests.

While designing a data center with such standards can be [...] [...]

Sweden stressed that its primary interest was in creating a clear legal basis for such activities, which was in conformity with its human rights obligations.

As no State can be bound by a reservation to which it has not consented, it necessarily follows that each State objecting to it will or will not, on the basis of its individual appraisal within the limits of the criterion of the object and purpose [...] [...]

[...] [...] to plan ahead with their limited resources.

[...] [...] or partially accept or reject depending on its own legal analysis.

In describing the potential of MOST, the Council agreed that MOST relies on, inter alia: being an international platform that mobilizes Member State’s support for social sciences in their countries; being a resource that in a highly visible way creates demand and awareness in policymakers of their need for social science research in policy formulation; having the responsibility to promote and support capacity-building initiatives, particularly on systemic issues that require government action; the illustration of the credibility and relevance of MOST’s objectives by working through a select number of globally-significant social transformations, in accordance with Main Lines of Action 2 and 3 in Major Programme III on Social and Human Sciences of 36 C/5; and, encouraging participatory processes, engaging with civil society, and creating greater sensitivity to the need for social sciences.

UNESCO advocated for stronger evidence-based planning and [...] [...]

Furthermore, the General Committee draws to the attention of the General Assembly that the practice of reproducing statements in extenso as separate documents has been discontinued for all its subsidiary organs that are entitled to summary records and that any exceptions to this rule may be made by the body concerned only if the statements are to serve as bases for discussion and if, after hearing a statement of the relevant financial implications, the body decides that one or more statements in extenso may be included in the summary record, or reproduced as separate documents or as annexes to authorized documents (resolution 38/32 E, paras. 8 and 9).

[...] [...] contributing substantively to evidence-based planning in the education [...] [...]

The major challenge encountered in this process has been how to maintain UNESCO’s specificity, hence strength, as a specialized agency with its complex composites of intergovernmental committees with its own political and technical agendas in the promotion of international conventions, normative and standard-setting programmes to serve as exemplars in addressing major global issues in the fields of competence of the Organization.