▾

External sources (not reviewed)

audit to the Committee at its 67th meeting

tender ascertained not only on the basis of the criteria (as in the 1994 text) but also applying the procedures for evaluating tenders specified in the solicitation documents.

exchange rate that will be used for the conversion of tenders into that currency or a statement that the rate published by a specified financial institution prevailing on a specified date will be used, [unless in a domestic procurement the procuring entity decides that this information is not necessary];41 (t) References to this Law, the procurement regulations and other laws and regulations directly pertinent to the procurement proceedings, including those applicable to procurement involving classified information, and the place42 where these laws and regulations may be found

documents, according to the rate set out in those documents (thus amending 1994 article 34(5)).

accordance with article 11(5)(a) of the Model Law [**hyperlink**], whether the successful submission will be ascertained on the basis of only price or of price and other criteria is to be defined in the solicitation documents at the outset of the procurement and cannot be subsequently varied.

the costs and risks to which they would be exposed during such a period (e.g., tied capacity and inability to tender elsewhere; the risks of higher manufacturing or construction costs).

applied in procedural articles in Chapters III-VII [**hyperlinks**]), to either the lowest-priced tender or the most advantageous tender.

to the strategic deployment stocks; authorize invoices for paying vendors against the appropriate receiving and inspection reports; review the end-of-fiscal year inventory report; and assist in the development of requirements for strategic deployment stocks, Divisional support and the implementation of new projects, as required, in field missions.

lifetime of contracts through the positive weighting of different performance attributes in the evaluation of submissions.

representatives of external vendors/contractors; approval of purchase orders within his/her delegated authority and, in cases where the amounts exceed his/her delegated authority, preparation of submissions to the Contracts Committee for its review and for the approval of the official with the delegated procurement authority.

to a single contractor/service provider exceeding the established approval thresholds without submitting the case for review; use of consultants instead of temporary staff for regular programme activities; lack of monitoring mechanisms to ensure that the total value of orders actually placed under long term agreements was within recommended limits; and delegation of procurement responsibilities to partners without the prior assessment of their capacity.

of the subject matter of the procurement, it shall select suppliers or contractors from whom to solicit tenders in a nondiscriminatory manner, and it shall select a sufficient number of suppliers or contractors to ensure effective competition.

the higher-education institution to society; and by building partnerships between different members of the academic community and beyond.

to whether this was the most cost-effective and economical means of meeting the needs of the Fund without compromising data security or confidentiality.