▾

External sources (not reviewed)

That commentary might suggest, for example, that (f) the location from which financing was organized or authorized or the location of the debtor’s primary bank, would only be important where the bank controlled the debtor; that (k) the location of employees, might be important where employees could be future creditors, or less important on the basis that protection of employees is more an issue of protecting the rights of interested parties, is not relevant to the COMI analysis and is, in any event addressed by article 22 of the Model Law; that (e) the jurisdiction whose law would apply to most disputes, was not sufficiently important to be a determining factor and could, in any event, be a jurisdiction unrelated to the place from which the debtor was managed or conducted its business, factors that were both considered to be more important than (e).

[...] [...] migrants and members of minority groups experienced assault or threat more frequently than other members of [...]

It was noted, however, that it had to be recognized that there were times when immunity may be invoked to avoid the possibility of a serious intrusion into the internal affairs of a State, not to mention that the State of the official might itself wish to investigate and, if warranted, prosecute its own official or a State may wish to invoke immunity quickly, in order to avoid undue embarrassment or suffering on the part of its official.

[...] [...] aggression or other offences, especially when they are committed by State officials; the absence [...] [...]

In response to a request that, in future, the budget be presented as an explanatory narrative table – a format used by other convention secretariats, she recalled that a breakdown of consultant budget lines was already available to members upon request and that the Executive Committee was always advised of all savings returned or used, including by means of the footnotes in the Fund accounts document showing the savings returned or carried forward for particular lines.

[...] an analysis of all the information [...] [...]

The Government notes that the Special Rapporteur on the Freedom of Religion or Belief noted that “the text of the reservation does not clearly specify whether the reservation is limited to the manifestation aspects of the right, or whether it is also intended to apply to the freedom to have or adopt a religion or belief of one’s choice” and therefore referred to the General Comment No. 22 of the Human Rights Committee, which provides in paragraph 8 that States parties may not reserve the right to deny freedom of thought, conscience and religion or to deny minorities the right to profess their own religion.

[...] [...] 2011, but its aircrew filed a “ZZZZ” [...] [...]

In 2008, the population that was served by one medical-sanitary professional was: 428 people per physician; 1,807 people per dentist; 1,837 people per pharmaceutical chemist; 162 people per ancillary medical professional.

[...] [...] crimes covered therein, especially but not limited to law enforcement officers.

The main goals of the Road Map are: to reinforce the quality of administrative and operational management; to strengthen the mechanisms for systematic follow-up and implementation of the recommendations of the IGO; to build upon the IGO’s reputation as an impartial and independent entity within UNHCR; to enhance the sense of transparency and fairness in the follow up of the administration of discipline; and to act as an honest broker in providing advice and recommendations on complex challenges confronting senior management.

[...] [...] to other group members where, for example, all interested parties consent to the inclusion of more than one group member; the insolvency of one group member has the potential to affect other group members; the parties [...] [...]

The IMF’s “2011 Article IV Consultation”, Country Report No.11/135, mentions sanctions only as having been raised by some Zimbabwe officials who felt they hindered economic recovery.

[...] [...] controlled by similar naturals as members of governing bodies [...]

[...] [...] developed one to agreed levels in network architecture, website design, structure [...] [...]

The report on proposals for financing the associated costs (A/64/346/Add.2) detailed the status of implementation of approved resources for the biennium 2008-2009 and resource requirements for 2010, which remained broadly in line with the level requested in the previous report on associated costs (A/63/582), except for an adjustment to general temporary assistance resources to accommodate already approved staffing levels.

[...] [...] attributed to their members was more appropriate [...]

Under this agenda item, the Commission heard a presentation made by one of its members raising, inter [...] [...]

In the Medical Services Section, the establishment of 15 additional national posts (6 National Officers and 9 national General Service staff) is proposed, as the Section has over the past years expanded the services it provides, which include round-the-clock operation of the UNOCI headquarters clinic, which is now functioning at level I-plus rather than the previous level I; patients are followed up at their homes after discharge from level III hospitals; patients are regularly visited in the 11 level III hospitals in Abidjan and in Sector West and Sector East; doctors in the regional headquarters perform outreach activity by visiting remote offices twice a week; support is provided to the Government during important functions and to the United Nations country team as part of the United Nations integrated framework; and medical support is proposed to be provided eight hours a day at the logistics base in Koumassi as opposed to the current two hours a day.

During this session, the SHS and SC Commissions examined the resolution proposed in document 35 C/COM SC/DR.1 (submitted by: Austria, Belgium, Plurinational State of Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Congo, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Finland, Iceland, Libya, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, New Zealand, Netherlands, Norway, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Poland, Portugal, Samoa, Senegal, Slovenia, Sweden, Tuvalu, Uruguay; co-sponsored by: Barbados, Costa Rica, Germany, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Monaco, Pakistan, Solomon Islands, Suriname, and Zambia), requesting the Director-General to strengthen UNESCO’s specialized capacity on climate change, building upon UNESCO’s unique interdisciplinary profile.

[...] [...] small number of staff in numerous small [...] [...]

In its report on cross-cutting issues related to peacekeeping operations, the Committee noted the generally positive trend in the reduction of the number of allegations involving peacekeeping personnel and commended the joint efforts of the Secretary-General and troop- and policecontributing countries that brought this about (A/65/743, para. 103).

[...] [...] integration of staff into the social security system of host countries; the possibility for staff members and their families to retire in the host countries; and the payment of value added tax (VAT) and [...]

For a good understanding of the scope of the problem in the case of staff in the General Service and related categories (GS), it must be pointed out that as they are not covered by the new rotation policy, the career development opportunities planned under the policy are not open to them.

[...] [...] expressed by its members will impel the parties [...] [...]

[...] [...] or your family member faces if forced [...]

[...] [...] soldiers, police officers, advisers and [...] [...]

(vi) any proposal or arrangement concerning the adoption, modification or operation of a share option scheme, a pension fund or retirement, death or disability benefits scheme or other arrangement which relates both to Directors or his associate(s) and to employees of the Company or of any of its subsidiaries and does not provide in respect of any Director, or his associate(s), as such any privilege or advantage not accorded generally to the class of persons to which such scheme or fund relates.

The reason was that the exemption method was not necessarily exclusive, as noted by one participant (e.g., exemption with progression, where the residence State retained for itself the right to take the exempt income into account for the purposes of determining the marginal rate at which the taxpayer’s non-exempt income was subject to tax).