▾

External sources (not reviewed)

This budgeting technique, referred to as zero real growth budgeting, implies that the increase in the budget appropriation from one biennium to another only compensates the loss of purchasing power and allows the Organization to maintain the same level of activity, i.e. zero volume increase, without providing any new resource.

This implies that so-called permanent connections [...]

[...] doubts the couple’s intention to divorce and the [...]

The period under consideration was significant for the international debate on the central role of culture for development and in the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

Also, cities and local authorities [...] [...]

[...] rejected the so-called “resolutions” [...] [...]

In that context, it expresses our country’s strong disagreement with the attempt to endorse the erroneously named “Copenhagen [...] [...]

In addition, it should be noted that under main line of action 6 (Mainstreaming within national policies of the links between cultural diversity, intercultural dialogue and sustainable development), document 34 C/5 calls for encouraging “South-South cooperation and North-South-South triangular cooperation so as to foster the emergence of a platform facilitating the sharing of cooperation experiences among developing countries” not by direct action in this field (fellowships, courses, subventions are to be discontinued) but rather by “cooperation with specialized institutions (for instance with ICCROM, ICOMOS and ICOM), and the systematic development of what are referred [...] [...]

In this context, the Belhas v. Moshe Ya’alon decision could be considered significant in that it upheld the proposition that under customary international law, immunity ratione materiae covers acts performed by every official in the exercise of his functions and that a violation of a jus cogens norm did not necessarily remove immunity.503 114.

[...] of Azerbaijan considers historical assertions [...] [...]

Expressing grave concern about the continuation by Israel, the occupying Power, of settlement activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, in violation of international humanitarian law, relevant United Nations resolutions and the agreements reached between the parties, and concerned particularly about Israel’s construction and expansion of settlements in and around occupied East Jerusalem, including its so-called E-1 plan that aims to connect its illegal settlements around and further isolate occupied East Jerusalem, the continuing demolition of Palestinian homes and eviction of Palestinian families from the city, and intensifying settlement activities in the Jordan Valley

Expressing grave concern in particular about Israel’s construction and expansion of settlements in and around occupied East Jerusalem, including its so called E-1 plan that aims to connect its illegal settlements around and further isolate occupied East Jerusalem, the continuing demolition of Palestinian homes and eviction of Palestinian families from the city, the revocation of Palestinian residency rights in the city, and ongoing settlement activities in the Jordan Valley

It is noteworthy that programmes implemented by the Office in the area education focused on the following strategic areas of support, all directly responding to strategies and results contained in Kenya Education Sector Support Programme (KESSP), the education sector’s plan to materialize Vision 2030: strengthening the planning, monitoring and evaluation of the education system through EMIS; enhancing the education sector responses to HIV and AIDS; improving the quality of education for peace programme; and strengthening literacy development through advocacy and technical support to strategic planning.

[...] [...] Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, [...] [...]

Even though governments still have a preference for local satellite operators, we believe that they will recognise the benefits of an open market and hence will eventually allow foreign operators to enter these markets without restrictions.

[...] [...] Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, [...] [...]

It was pointed out that, while the grounds relating to public order and national security were certainly the most important, they were not the sole grounds, and that drawing up a supposedly exhaustive list of grounds for expulsion would unduly restrict the discretion that the expelling State must be allowed in order to determine those grounds.

(c) The Company may upon the recommendation of the Board by ordinary resolution resolve in respect of any one particular dividend of the Company that notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this Article a dividend may be satisfied wholly in the form of an allotment of shares credited as fully paid up without offering any right to shareholders to elect to receive such dividend in cash in lieu of such allotment.