▾

External sources (not reviewed)

Views differ on what such an agenda should consist of, but stakeholders seem to agree that there is a need to work towards a single United Nations development [...] [...]

A number of specific comments were made as follows: the concept of food safety is universal, thus there should be no exception, as presently in Article 4.2, allowing exporting countries to export food, which does not comply with [...] [...]

[...] [...] cooperative means to support implementation; and, that there would be no report produced attributing views to any participant [...]

[...] [...] works, from ending violence against women to increasing women’s contributions to peace and security; (b) devising and coordinating multi-stakeholder, holistic country programmes that involve inter-agency participation and national partners in line with [...] [...]

[...] [...] possible common international standards for the transfer of conventional arms, bearing in mind the views and recommendations [...] [...]

Consideration may be given in this particular regard to requiring that the Contracts Committee reach a unanimous decision or, failing such unanimity, that, on the basis of minutes of the Committee setting out the divergent opinions, the matter be referred to the Director-General to decide in fine and in person on any departure from the application of the rules essential to the smooth running of the Organization, on condition that the Manual so provides.

[...] [...]

[...] yet as could be wished owing to the wide-ranging nature of UNESCO’s programming – from policy-level advocacy to managing small-scale projects in a single community, as well as UNESCO’s limited financing capacity.

[...] [...] Council to ensure the implementation of the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice and General Assembly [...] [...]

The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, at its fifty-fourth session, in June 2011, made informed and competent decisions that integrate consolidated ideas and proposals of different States and groups of States on the terms of reference and methods of work of the Working Group on the Long-term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities in the context of multilateral space diplomacy conducted in the framework of the United Nations.

(a) To assure that children are given the opportunity to be heard on all matters affecting them, without discrimination on any grounds, by adopting and/or continuing to implement regulations and arrangements that provide for and encourage, as appropriate, the participation of children in all settings, including within the family, in school and in their communities, and that are firmly anchored in laws and institutional codes and are regularly evaluated with regard to their effectiveness

[...] of the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons states that “the threat [...] [...]

With regard to the comments and recommendations made during the review, including with regard to the scope of Bhutan’s international human rights commitments, the strengthening of support for civil society organizations, measures to combat [...]

[...] [...] comments for improving the report of the Executive Board; (2) the best way to merge Parts I and II of the report, Part I being the report of the Executive Board on its own activities, and Part II being a report on its assessment [...] [...]

[...] [...] policy and practice of the Republic of Armenia, the occupying Power, implemented inter alia through various illegal activities in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan, clearly testify to its intention to secure the annexation of these territories (see, for example, the most recent document circulated by Azerbaijan: A/64/760-S/2010/211).

[...] [...] of the Child and, where appropriate, the views of relevant United Nations special procedures and other [...]

(c) Lastly, it should be mentioned once again that Venezuela is not a party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and that the fact that it has not objected to the documents adopted at this Conference cannot be interpreted as a change in position in respect of that Convention and its role in the context of a future legal regime applicable to marine resources beyond the areas of national jurisdiction.

The Lead IA, along with the Cooperating IA will also undertake the challenging task of monitoring illegal ODS imports and exports and advise the appropriate national agencies through the National Ozone Office.

There was divergence in the opinion on scientific assessment, the manner of considering consumer preferences as part of factors influencing Codex standards, and on the fulfilment of all Codex requirements to support adoption of the draft MRLs.

[...] [...] organizations have not been expressly covered either in the articles on the responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts or in the draft articles on the responsibility of international organizations”; some examples of these issues were given; and the Commission asked for comments and observations from Governments and international organizations about the context in which these questions should be considered (A/64/10, paras. 27 and 28).

A number of specific comments were made as follows: the reference of the Code on the Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes is important; the Code should be generic and focus on the protection of consumers in countries which do not have adequate control [...] [...]

[...] [...] (a) the nature and form of advice that the Forum can give to OHCHR; (b) the nature of the information provided annually by OHCHR to the Forum; (c) the possible cooperation of members of the Forum with OHCHR in its activities at the country level; (d) the ways for improving dialogue between [...] [...]

Any objection formulated to the reservation continues to have effect as long as its author does not withdraw it, insofar as the objection does not apply exclusively to that part of the reservation which has been withdrawn.

[...] to provide future-oriented indications [...] [...]

[...] [...] System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (CEB) (A/66/315/Add.1 and Add.1/Corr.1); the note by the Secretary-General transmitting the JIU report entitled “Policies and procedures [...]

[...] [...] scientifically sound inputs for the analysis [...] [...]

[...] [...] organizations and other international organizations and bodies, as listed in section V of the terms of reference and methods of work of the Working Group (A/66/20, annex II), as well as from national non-governmental organizations and private sector actors through relevant States members of the Committee.

This included: (a) in 2005, Agrenska participated in the launch of ICORD and authorized the start of a network of centres that worked in the field of family programmes; (b) the Ministry built the centre after a visit to the Agrenska Centre in Gothenburg during 2008 and started a cooperation between the two centres; (c) in October 2007, Queen Silvia of Sweden, together with the First Lady of Estonia, Mrs. Ilves, inaugurated the Eesti Agrenska centre for families who have children with disabilities; Eesti Agrenska is situated in Tammistu, outside Tartu, in Estonia; the centre works in close cooperation with the Agrenska Foundation in Sweden; (d) the University Hospital in Newcastle in Australia started a family programme in line with the Agrenska model; (e) in order to start a better cooperation between the Nordic countries in the field of rare disorders, a project was started in which Mr. Olauson participated as a resource person.