▾

External sources (not reviewed)

33 C/19 on the principles and guidelines for the establishment and functioning of UNESCO Institutes and Centres.

which at the time were already regarded as deriving from the concept of protection contained in Article 46 (2) and Article 56 (2) of the Annex to the Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land of 1907 and which were later dealt with more specifically in the 1954 (First) Protocol to the Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict.

approval of the IHP Bureau (April 2008), and adopted Resolution XVIII-3 (Annex I), by which, considering the establishment of the proposed Centre as an important contribution to achieving the goals of IHP, it requested the Secretariat’s assistance in preparing the documentation to be submitted to the governing bodies of UNESCO, and invited Member States and in particular the existing UNESCO network of centres and institutes which address relevant water issues, especially at the regional level, to actively support the proposed Centre and ensure cooperation with the existing regional centres.

of Burundi concerning article 2, paragraph 2, and article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents, to be incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention” (ibid.).

study, although the cost of the main mission for the feasibility study of the proposed Centre was covered by the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany.

of the Convention on the Rights of the Child are incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention (article 51, paragraph 2) and therefore objects to them.

operation of the centre (181 EX/Decision 17, Part II).

are committed to human rights and to ensuring the freedom of teaching, learning and research within a framework based on democratic principles.

the type described [in paragraph 2 of article 11 of the Convention] but instead to mark specifically those items in their invoices which contain substances and preparations in Schedule III.

art. 11 of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women).

of Germany/Netherlands), I.C.J. Reports 1969, p. 26, paragraph 30; 26 November 1984, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, I.C.J. Reports 1984, p. 415, para. 51; or 13 September 1990, Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador/Honduras: Nicaragua intervening)), Request by Nicaragua for Permission to Intervene, I.C.J. Reports 1990, p. 118, para. 63.

26 of the [said Covenant] is reprimanded, if and insofar as the reprimanded violation refers to rights other than those guaranteed under the aforementioned Covenant.

Tribunal for the Law of the Sea by the Federal Republic of Germany be circulated as a document of the Meeting of States Parties.

measures, the Federal Government points out that Germany has adopted extensive measures to combat trafficking in persons and in women, deploying the police services at both federal level and the level of the Länder, and also intends to adopt tougher measures in this area in the future.