▾

External sources (not reviewed)

(f) People who perpetrate acts of violence against women while voluntarily under the influence of alcohol, drugs or other substances are not exempted from criminal responsibility

[...] [...] destructive stance with regard to the [...] [...]

Provide that no custom, tradition or religious consideration may be invoked to justify violence against women.

case reflects a number of factors including: the size of the Office of the Prosecutor’s evidence collection, which comprises some 9,000,000 pages; Karadžić’s high profile and senior position during the four-year conflict, resulting in enormous quantities of documents that are potentially relevant to his acts and conduct; the breadth of the Prosecution’s disclosure obligations under Rules 66 and 68 requiring disclosure of materials on peripheral issues and issues about which there is no dispute; the fact that Karadžić has requested, pursuant to Rule 66 (B), material falling under more than 170 different topics; and Karadžić’s many potential exculpatory claims that are peripheral to the main issues of the case, but nevertheless require disclosure searches and reviews by the Office of the Prosecutor.

[...] [...] to exonerate itself, even if only at a political level, from responsibility.

One Chinese analyst observed that perhaps China should have taken a clearer position against the launch because the ambiguity of China’s position led to it having to defend itself at the UN.

Two points are discussed in the following article: first, the literary activity of the Monophysites both in Greek and Syriac; secondly, the question whether they can be exculpated from material heresy in their Christology.

The State party should ensure that its domestic legislation includes a provision expressly prohibiting the invocation of exceptional circumstances as a justification of torture.

Moreover, States parties may in no circumstance invoke the Covenant’s provisions on derogations as justification for acting in violation of humanitarian law or peremptory norms of international law, for instance by taking hostages, by imposing collective punishments, through arbitrary deprivations of liberty or by deviating from fundamental principles of fair trial, including the presumption of innocence.

The members of the Council reaffirmed that terrorism in all its forms and manifestations constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security, and that any acts of terrorism are criminal and unjustifiable, regardless of their motivation, wherever, whenever and by whomsoever committed.

[...] [...] law but are, above all, unjustified [...]

[...] [...] any provisions that can be used as a justification or means for an excuse for torture, under any circumstances, the Committee is concerned at the lack of [...] [...]

Furthermore, marginalized groups, including indigenous peoples and minorities, often justify violence against women based on collective identity formed in opposition to the dominant and oppressing group.

In the event that traditional reconciliation has been undertaken, that should not be used as a mitigating factor in formal court decisions where, in some cases, traditional reconciliation practices have been used as a means of excusing the perpetrator.

The Islamic Republic of Iran, along with other States, had always condemned genocide against any race, ethnic group or religious group as being a crime against humanity, which could never be justified.

This device releases an alarm or disengages automatically, if the connection is separated [...] [...]

These are installed using high-strength sealant, apply heat to help break free when removing.