▾

External sources (not reviewed)

Even though the Rijeka court applied the Croatian municipal law, the Court affirmed the first instance decision because the outcome under the CISG would have been the same as in the first instance.

[...] [...] the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education.

Decisions of the [appeals body][enforcement branch] shall be final and binding on the entities referred to in paragraph 38 below and on the Executive Board.

Furthermore, the number of cases on the Court’s list had remained relatively stable for several years, at an average of 15 to 16 cases, while the number of cases finally decided was comparable to the number of new cases submitted to it.

[...] to enable the Tribunal to fulfil its duties.

According to its end-of-mandate report, the Commission for Bosnia and Herzegovina adopted some 311,000 final and binding decisions confirming property rights by the end of its mandate in December 2003, and close to 80 per cent of the Commission’s decisions on residential property had been implemented.35 This contributed to the restitution of property to approximately 1 million displaced persons.

He has also been a Member of the Tribunal in the Women’s Courts on Victims of Development (1994) and on Racism (2001), organized by Asian Women’s Human Rights Commission; and a Member of the Jury in the Public Hearing on the Sardar Sarovar Project, organized by the Indian People’s Tribunal on Environment and Human Rights (2000).

[...] [...] functional land adjudication bodies, training for land adjudicators on due process, non-discrimination, and gender standards, and advocacy at the national level for prioritization and resource provision for oversight and review of local land adjudication.

This provides an opportunity for all concerned, including the EU and U.S., to move beyond absolutist positions and ambivalence, reengage on the issue and seek practical options for breaking the political deadlock.

Turning to the report of the Secretary-General on the proposed budget for the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia for the biennium 2010-2011 (A/64/476), he said that five main developments would affect the Tribunal’s workload in 2010-2011: the continuation of a seventh trial in the first three quarters of 2010; the high complexity of trials and appeals in multiple-accused cases; the completion of seven firstinstance trials during the biennium; an increase in the number and complexity of interlocutory appeals and appeals on merits; and a reduction in first-instance trial activity as from the third quarter of 2010.

[...] [...] the DG/GM to be reviewed and approved by [...] [...]

[...] [...] devoted to general consideration of the draft [...] [...]

[...] [...] recommendations in the UNDC’s 2011 sessions.

At its sixty-second session, the General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to update the compilation of decisions of international courts, tribunals and other bodies referring to the articles, and to invite Governments to submit information on their practice in that regard; also requested the Secretary-General to submit that material well in advance of its sixty-fifth session; and decided to further examine, within the framework of a working group of the Sixth Committee, the question of a convention on responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts or other appropriate action on the basis of the articles (resolution 62/61).

[...] [...] Secretary-General on concrete recommendations to enhance the implementation of the Barbados Programme of Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States and the Mauritius Strategy for the Further Implementation of the Programme of Action for the Sustainable Development of Small Island Developing States (A/66/278) and on the review of United Nations system [...] [...]

[...] [...] in curricula review and revision, [...] [...]

[...] Commissions examined the resolution [...] [...]

[...] [...] post from the Disarmament and Peace Affairs [...] [...]

For the purposes of more comprehensive protection, each State is encouraged to take all appropriate measures, in accordance with international law, to cooperate with other States concerned with a view to establishing jurisdiction over, and providing effective criminal sanctions against, those persons who have committed or have ordered to be committed acts referred to above (VII – Individual criminal responsibility) and who are found present on its territory, regardless of their nationality and the place where such act occurred.

Clause 11 of the Bill proposes to add sections 67(2A) and 67(2B) to the effect that at the end of the trial of an election petition that relates to the inclusion of the name of a person in, or the exclusion of the name of a person from a precedence list, CFI must determine whether the name is to be included in the list, and at the end of the trial of an election petition that relates to the ranking of a person on a precedence list, CFI must determine whether the ranking of the person on the list is correct and, if not correct, what is the correct ranking.

His delegation requested the international community, as a matter of urgency: to take all the measures indicated in the conclusions and recommendations of the report contained in document A/64/339, including the imposition of sanctions on Israel if it failed to comply fully with all United Nations resolutions; to request Israel to allow the members of the Special Committee to enter the occupied territories in order to fulfil its mandate; and to require the Israeli Government to pay appropriate compensation for the damage it had inflicted on the Palestinians and the population of the occupied Syrian Golan.