▾

External sources (not reviewed)

This engagement did not involve independent examination of any of the underlying financial information.

(23) To appoint sales agents [...] [...]

In June 1997, we upgraded 556CL “Planning and engineering feasibility study for development at Anderson Road” to Category A at an estimated cost of $18.7 million in MOD prices for engaging consultants to carry out the planning and engineering feasibility study for the proposed development.

[...] [...] prior to his appointment to a subsidiary [...]

Drafts of this report and our calculation have been presented to the management of the Company, which has reviewed and orally confirmed to us that this report and factors included in the calculation are accurate in all material aspects and to the best of their knowledge there is no material matter regarding our engagement that have not been included.

As set out in paragraph 9(b) above, under the expanded SLAS, the rate of final contribution for Type II proceedings (i.e. the new types of civil proceedings apart from those relating to Labour Tribunal appeals and existing types of civil proceedings for professional negligence claims) is 20% or 15% if the claim is settled before the date of commencement of the trial or the hearing, or if counsel is engaged, before the delivery a brief to counsel for attendance at the trial or the hearing.

[...] [...] products should appoint a laboratory to [...] [...]

Asian Capital has been appointed to advise us in this [...] [...]

(ii) determine the terms of engagement and the extent of funding necessary for payment of compensation to any consultant retained to advise the RC.

[...] involved, the BD has engaged private sector [...] [...]

The appointment of such general [...] [...]

Drafts of this report and our calculation have been presented to the management of the Company, which has reviewed and orally confirmed to us that this report and factors included in the calculation are accurate in all material aspects and to the best of their knowledge there is no material matter regarding our engagement that have not been included.

[...] [...] Committee to advise the Independent Board Committee in respect of [...] [...]

[...] [...] accordance with our agreed terms of engagement [...]

The Audit Committee’s approval is required for (1) any Excluded Service (2) and other engagement where either (i) the fee is contingent, (ii) the fee may exceed $  500,000, or (iii) where the fees for all non-audit work may exceed $ 15  million.

(1) Subject to the manner of retirement by rotation of Directors as from time to time prescribed under the rules of the Designated Stock Exchange, and notwithstanding any contractual or other terms on which any Director may be appointed or engaged, at each annual general meeting one third of the Directors for the time being (or, if their number is not a multiple of three (3), the number nearest to but not less than one-third) shall retire from office by rotation provided that every Director shall be subject to retirement at least once every three years.

[...] applicant should appoint a laboratory (detailed [...] [...]

This review included engaging an external third [...] [...]

[...] entered into an appointment letter with each of the independent non-executive Directors of the Company for a term of one year, and appointment of which will [...] [...]

[...] [...] payable, or the liability or engagement in respect of which such lien exists is liable to be presently fulfilled or discharged nor until the expiration of fourteen (14) clear days after a notice in writing, stating and demanding payment of the sum presently payable, or specifying the liability [...] [...]

Subject as otherwise provided by the Companies Act, the remuneration of the Auditors shall be fixed by or on the authority of the Company in the annual general meeting except that in any particular year the Company in general meeting may delegate the fixing of such remuneration to the Board and the remuneration of any Auditors appointed to fill any casual vacancy may be fixed by the Directors.

[...] [...] thereof, or the termination thereof).

making recommendations to the Board on the terms of engagement letters of the Non-executive Directors of the Company and their directors’ fees for the years 2006, 2007 and 2008.

[...] [...] Kong Limited, the Board of Directors engaged [...] [...]

They enable litigants to retain a lawyer in circumstances which would otherwise, because of the cost deterrent factor, not be possible.

(a) be primarily responsible for making recommendations to the Board on the appointment, reappointment and removal of the external auditor, and to approve the remuneration and terms of engagement of the external auditor, and any questions of resignation or dismissal of that auditor

[...] [...] Directors and appointment of Auditors [...] [...]

(c) in accordance with the respective terms of the Minmetals Aluminium Sale and Purchase Agreement, the 2008 NCA Master Agreement, 2008 Minmetals Aluminium Master Agreement, the Shanxi Guanlv Purchase Framework Agreement, the Shanxi Guanlv Sale Framework Agreement, the Supply Agreement, the 2011 MMG Connected Transactions, the MMG Loan Facility, the Power Purchase Agreement and the MEPA that are fair and reasonable and in the interests of the shareholders of the Company as a whole.

The Audit Committee is mainly responsible for making recommendations to the Board on the appointment, reappointment [...] [...]