▾

External sources (not reviewed)

In many such systems, the decision to detain is not subject to review by a court or other independent judicial body.

[...] [...] administrative review internally, and [...]

All States countering terrorism must comply with their obligations under international law, in particular by ensuring respect for the absolute prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; ensuring that all persons deprived of liberty benefit from the guarantees to which they are entitled under international law, including the review of the detention and other fundamental judicial guarantees; ensuring that no form of deprivation of liberty places a detained person outside the protection of the law; respecting due process obligations and the right to a fair trial; abiding fully by non-refoulement obligations; ensuring legality in the criminalization of acts of terrorism; and respecting the right to an effective remedy.

The law was proposed by the previous Government and is currently being reviewed by the Croatian constitutional court.

We believe that compensating controls should be in place to provide an effective cross-check of the accuracy and propriety of changes introduced into the system and to ensure that prior approvals and thorough testing is performed before revisions are implemented.

Any matter regarding judicial review is a matter for our Courts to decide based on the uniqueness of each case.

[...] [...] the terminal phase-out plan (TPMP).

The audit review identified [...] [...]

[...] [...] an effective review of decisions.

Automatic review of these measures is not envisaged.

He submits that supervisory review, according to the domestic legislation, is to be conducted by the Supreme Court, but that one of his appeals was rejected by the Head of the Department for Citizens’ Complaints rather than the Court itself.

Main results included: a compilation of data on educational legislation, governance and financing in 184 countries for the 2009 EFA Global Monitoring Report; a content analysis of 129 messages from Ministers of Education (48th ICE session); an exploratory analysis of 2008 National Reports on inclusive education in Latin America and the Caribbean; the cross-checking of data on primary education duration and statutory entry age in 80 countries for the Global Education Digest 2008; the final report of the 48th ICE and a CD-ROM containing all ICE materials; two papers of the IBE Working Papers on Curriculum Issues series; and one issue of the Educational Practices series.

Although it was generally agreed that the review of applications should include a careful examination of the organization’s activities as an intrinsic aspect of the eligibility criteria, there were nevertheless two divergent viewpoints within the working group on how to deal with the process: one approach included cross-checking against the existing list of terrorist organizations prepared by the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1373 (2001) concerning counter-terrorism as part of a precautionary review process; the other included using both the Security Council Committee list and national lists of barred, sanctioned and terrorist groups in reviewing all applications.

[...] [...] information, capital verification assurance, business [...] [...]

9 If the check test results are within the check test [...] [...]

[...] [...] thereby revive the nuclear arms race, a development [...] [...]

The EULEX War Crimes Investigation Unit completed a comprehensive review of the 888 cases for which the Prosecutor of the Special Prosecution Office of Kosovo issued a request for investigation in 2009.

(a) Commitments which, after review, are no longer considered valid shall be cancelled from the relevant budgetary records and the resulting credit surrendered.

(i) To fully respect non-refoulement obligations under international refugee and human rights law and, at the same time, to review, with full respect for these obligations and other legal safeguards, the validity of a refugee status decision in an individual case if credible and relevant evidence comes to light that indicates that the person in question has committed any criminal acts, including terrorist acts, falling under the exclusion clauses under international refugee law

[...] [...] services; fourthly, the restoration of core Government functions; [...]

From 1 January 2007 onward, all death-penalty review powers have uniformly reverted to the Supreme People’s Court.

Good practice in using interpreters and independent advisors in respect of culture, is to cross-check interpretations and advice to ensure that translations are accurate and free of bias, and to dispel any cultural myths.

The Supreme Court of Justice had denied constitutional appeals to the amendment but was reviewing its decision following an action by the Office of the Attorney General.

The Committee reminds the State party that if it is not in a position to review and resubmit the report, then translation of the report for purposes of examination of the treaty body cannot be guaranteed.

[...] currently in the process of improving the death-penalty review procedure, and unifying standards for the application of the death penalty, so as to ensure that such cases are reviewed with [...]

Whether creating a company’s first international program for employees, re-examining the operational effectiveness of an existing program, taking a second look at a current provider, or transitioning the administration of a program to address regulatory concerns, Deloitte’s International Human Resources professionals can help.

The authorities which arrest a person, keep him under detention or investigate the case shall exercise only the powers granted to them under the law and the exercise of these powers shall be subject to recourse to a judicial or other authority.