▾

External sources (not reviewed)

Ordinary resolutions will also be proposed at the Annual General Meeting in respect of the granting of the Issue Mandate to the Directors, in the terms set out in the notice of the Annual General Meeting, to allot, issue and deal with Shares not exceeding 20% of the aggregate nominal amount of the share capital of the Company in issue as at the date of passing the relevant resolution, and adding to the Issue Mandate so granted to the Directors any Shares representing the aggregate nominal amount of the Shares repurchased by the Company after the granting of the Repurchase Mandate, at any time during the period ended on the earliest of (a) the conclusion of the next annual general meeting of the Company; (b) the expiration of the period within which the next annual general meeting of the Company is required by the Articles or any applicable laws to be held; and (c) the date upon which such authority is revoked or varied by an ordinary resolution at a general meeting of Shareholders.

[...] [...] notification"), and (b) a response facility through which the data subject might indicate in writing to the data user whether the data subject objected to the intended use or sale, and the data subject would be taken not to object if no reply indicating [...]

[...] [...] support, all directly responding to strategies and [...] [...]

In response to Dr Priscilla LEUNG's concern about the regulation of the use and transfer of personal data in corporate mergers, Acting Deputy Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data advised that as corporate mergers were common commercial activities, the Bill proposed to exempt from Data Protection Principle 3 the transfer or disclosure of personal data for use in due diligence exercises in connection with mergers provided that (a) the personal data to be transferred were necessary; (b) the data transferee would provide the same products or services to the data subjects as did the original data user; (c) the consent of the data subjects to the data transfer could not be obtained despite the taking of all reasonably practicable steps; and (d) the data transfer did not include sale of the data.

In her response to the debate, the representative of ADG/BSP said that the call for a clearer relationship between UNESCO’s functions and programme execution, for the broader multi-stakeholder involvement, the enhanced visibility of extrabudgetary and regular programme funds, and for the results achieved regarding gender equality, would be fully taken into account in the next C/5 document.

The Advisory Committee recalls that in document [...] [...]

[...] [...] warrant or order is returned to the Company undelivered, [...] [...]

[...] to the option repurchase expenses (including [...] [...]

The Share Repurchase Mandate will [...] [...]

[...] [...] account and capital redemption reserve fund) as [...] [...]

[...] [...] the United Kingdom; recalled its declaration and special communiqué on the exploration for fossil fuels on the continental shelf around the Islands, adopted by the Heads of State and Government of Latin America and the Caribbean gathered at the Unity Summit held in Mexico on 22 and 23 February 2010; rejected the military activities of the United Kingdom in the Islands, which ran counter to the region’s policy of seeking a solution to the dispute through peaceful means; and also recalled the declaration on [...] [...]

[...] [...] respect to the return of displaced persons in order to respond to possible [...] [...]

The Chairman responded that there was no [...] [...]

The President also recalled that the States [...] [...]

[...] all shares repurchases of a company with its primary listing on the Stock Exchange must be approved in advance by an ordinary resolution of the shareholders in general meeting, either by a general mandate to the directors of the company to make such repurchases or by a specific [...]

Yemen recalled the recent Israeli attack against the Gaza strip and indicated that Israel has ignored recommendations since 1948 and so it is not surprising that it will ignore the largest number of UPR recommendations, specially those related to putting an end to the occupation in all occupied Palestinian and Arab territories and to recognizing the right of Palestinian people to self-determination, to an independent sovereign state with Jerusalem as a capital, and to the right of return of Palestinian [...] [...]

[...] [...] Cap. 132, issued to recall food from the market [...] [...]

[...] [...] the State to respond to social demands.

[...] fluid housing, check valve cartridge, [...]

[...] [...] cooperation and the recovery of assets at the [...] [...]

(c) An alternate Director shall (except when absent from Hong Kong, for which purpose he shall be deemed absent from Hong Kong on any day if he has given to the Secretary notice of his intention to be absent from Hong Kong for any period including such day and has not revoked such notice) be entitled to receive notices of meeting of the Directors and shall be entitled to attend and vote as a Director at any such meeting at which the Director appointing him is not personally present and generally at such meeting to perform all the functions of his appointor as a Director, and for the purposes of the proceedings at such meeting the provisions of these Articles shall apply as if he (instead of his appointor) were a Director.

(b) To be valid, a form of proxy in the prescribed form together with the power of attorney or other authority, if any, under which it is signed, or a certified copy of such power or authority, must be deposited at the Company’s branch share registrar in Hong Kong, Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited, at Shops 1712-1716, 17/F, Hopewell Centre, 183 Queen’s Road East, Wanchai, Hong Kong not less than 48 hours before the time fixed for holding the meeting (or any adjourned meeting).

[...] [...] have no choice but to return to the Security Council [...] [...]

At that session, the Commission agreed that: (i) any future review should be based on the previous deliberations on the subject in the Commission, the observations by France and the United States (A/CN.9/635 and A/CN.9/639, respectively), and the note by the Secretariat (A/CN.9/638 and addenda), which was considered as providing a particularly important historical overview of the establishment and evolution of UNCITRAL rules of procedure and methods of work; (ii) the Secretariat should be entrusted with the preparation of a working document describing current practices of the Commission with the application of rules of procedure and methods of work, in particular as regards decision-making and participation of non-State entities in the work of UNCITRAL, distilling the relevant information from its previous note (A/CN.9/638 and addenda); this working document would serve for future deliberations on the subject in the Commission in formal and informal settings.

An asset’s recoverable amount is calculated as the higher of the asset’s or cash-generating unit’s value in use and its fair value less costs to sell, and is determined for an individual asset, unless the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets or groups of assets, in which case the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.

[...] Progress Report recalled that at the Cartagena [...] [...]

The term in excess of three years is beneficial to the Company because (i) any term shorter than the License Term and the Secondary Trademark License Term would increase the risks associated with, and lower the returns on, the Group’s investment in its brand building of the Philips Contributed Business; (ii) following Completion, the Group is expected to invest substantial management effort to broaden the Philips Contributed Business’ product range and market share, the benefits of which will extend beyond three years; and (iii) it is the intention of the Company to strengthen the Philips Contributed Business and the presence of the Philips Trademarks and the Secondary Trademark in the markets in which the Scope Products are sold.

The representative of Japan recalled that a decision by the Sixteenth Meeting of the Parties had requested the Executive Committee to consider “(a) Funding additional demonstration projects to help demonstrate the value of replacement of CFC-based chillers, pursuant to relevant decisions of the Executive Committee; (b) Funding actions to increase awareness of users in countries operating under paragraph 1 of Article 5, of the impending phase-out and options that may be available for dealing with their chillers and to assist Governments and decision makers; (c) Requesting those countries preparing or implementing refrigerant management plans to consider developing measures for the effective use of the ozone-depleting substances recovered from the chillers [...]