▾

External sources (not reviewed)

These situations are imaginable in places where the economy is comparatively backward but with Hong Kong's economic achievements today, how come things will develop to such a sorry state?

Based on this verse, I very much wish to ask: Should we live as human beings in such a way?

[...] Kong is still what it used to be.

[...] and give us some examples?

But how does he know that this is an isolated case since there is no statistics, and he does not know the number of cases involving incorrect tax assessments?

When can the local players be entitled to or have a chance to get a slice of the cake or become players in these activities?

I believe it is most important that, besides making assessments and collecting data, the Government should state its position clearly on whether it welcomes mainland women to come to Hong Kong to give birth.

What does a bathroom collection inspired by modern city life look like?

Another example is that in part (b) of my main question I mentioned the examples of France, Germany, Japan and South Korea, and I did so because the Government had used Britain, Canada and the United States as examples in this survey.

The government is about to amend the Air Pollution Control Ordinance and propose to cap emissions of three types of air pollutants, namely sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and respirable suspended particulates, from the two electricity companies.

But will third States be prepared to accept, in advance, rules which make it easier for States participating in an internal conflict to terminate or suspend their treaty obligations?

Only for those who answered "half-half, quite oppose, very much oppose, don't know or refuse to answer" in the previous question, sub-sample size: 466, including 17 respondents who refused to answer this follow-up question] You mentioned that you [partly support, quite oppose, very much oppose, don't know, refuse to answer, subject to respondents' answers in the previous question] the proposal, is it because you think it is too radical or too conservative?

If we only say that because the Government's objectives are correct, and these objectives have to be achieved by carrying out this work, and therefore we cannot and need not monitor the process involved; or as pointed out by Mr LAU Kong-wah, once monitoring is carried out, the highly confidential nature and effectiveness of such work would be compromised, which would in turn jeopardize the security of the whole society; if this attitude is adopted ― I stress again ― if such logic, attitude or stance is adopted, there is no need for us to ask any question about the Government's funding proposal of $80 million this year, or $800 million next year or possibly $1.8 billion in the future, because there is nothing we can really ask.

But if, as we argue, developing countries should be encouraged to devise patent systems that suit their individual circumstances and objectives, which themselves will vary according to their stage of development, how should developing countries then proceed?

Second, when all the universities have injected resources into this "big reservoir" of the central pool of resources, will some institutions submit proposals to increase professional places in business administration or actuarial science or engineering and then take away all the resources, causing the most fundamental liberal arts education and the disciplines of literature, history and philosophy to shrink further and further?

[...] [...] correct and modify how to do.

[...] [...] to prevent terrorists from entering and [...] [...]

Such a situation makes the propriety of responding to the question posed by the General Assembly yet more dubious and problematic, while the United Nations has given the impression of adapting to the new state of affairs (though how could it do otherwise?).

Would there be any need for the United States, Japan and the European Union to pursue a confrontational “resolution” if they had no ulterior motive for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and were truly interested in dialogue and cooperation in the area of human rights?

In this context, it was suggested that both States Parties and the broader implementation community need to make sure that this actually happens, including moving beyond the general discussions of how to ensure that girls, boys, women and men have equal access to the resources generated through implementation of the Convention, and, by asking why progress has been so slow.

[...] [...] utilization of electronic means of disseminating publications; $111,000 under furniture and equipment, reflecting reduced requirements for the replacement of furniture and office equipment resulting from extending the lifespan of furniture and equipment; and $781,600 under grants and contributions, mainly owing to the termination of the contract with the International Computing Centre.

[...] [...] to cover the children of irregular [...]