▾

External sources (not reviewed)

projects involving system houses in the development and validation of non-HCFC blowing agents, the Executive Committee might wish to consider approving the pilot project.

second meeting of the Executive Committee each year.

strengthening national capacities in order to ensure better border control and address the challenges of a lack of security and underdevelopment; mobilizing more international aid for West African and Sahel countries; and, lastly, enhancing the interoperability among the various United Nations bodies already in the area and their presence in the field, given the fact that no United Nations body currently has a global mandate to cover the vast Sahel region.

of requests to the agencies in the following decisions: bilateral agencies (decision 64/7); UNDP (decision 64/8); UNEP (decision 64/9), UNIDO (decision 64/10) and the World Bank (decision 64/11).

to make efforts to remain within those indicative costs.

to the installation, assembly and charging sub-sector, to demonstrate that each of the enterprises participating in the project had invested in equipment, development of products, or 18 training of personnel specific to HCFC technology significantly exceeding the level of such investments prevalent in the servicing sector, and that the activities foreseen for those enterprises represented incremental costs (decision 62/14).

Finland to support the ratification of the MP by new Parties, from Spain for two methyl bromide related projects in Central America, and from Sweden in support of Regional Network activities in South East Asia and the Pacific.

other implementing and bilateral agencies that were in a position to do so, which would ensure that the project received the full funding approved.

and dedication the implementation of the Protocol would not have been so successful, and the Secretariat looked forward to working with them for many years to come.

to the 44th Meeting of the Executive Committee, analysing the potential need for projects to accelerate phase-out and maintain momentum, and to provide guidance on the need for a funding window to consider such projects; and to consider at its 44th Meeting the possible need for a funding window to accelerate phase-out and maintain momentum, as well as any related criteria for the selection of projects to be funded through that window (Decision 42/3, paras. d and e).

was achieved in 2009, the final year for CFC, halon and CTC consumption.

to the Secretariat for certain HCFC uses so that the Executive Committee could choose those projects that best demonstrated alternative technologies and facilitated the collection of accurate data on incremental capital cost and incremental operating costs or savings, as well as other data relevant to the application of the technology, on the understanding that the quantity of HCFCs to be phased out under those projects would be deducted from the starting point for sustained aggregate reductions in eligible consumption as set by the HPMP.

its proposals, including adoption of a core-unit funding budget in line with the arrangement made for the four implementing agencies in Executive Committee Decision 38/68.

plans for the 2005-2007 triennium, which they would be submitting to the 45th Meeting.

to ensure that financial and business planning was based firmly on the compliance needs of Article 5 countries, especially for 2011, the last year of the current replenishment period, while taking into account the total resources remaining for the current year and the potential resources available for the coming triennium, compared to the funding levels in the business plans submitted for approval.

for their efforts in reaching an agreement on stage I of China’s HPMP, as well as the two demonstration projects.

and cost-related issues that had not been resolved on the basis of the documents presented to the Executive Committee at its 62nd meeting.

current administrative cost regime to bilateral agencies.