▾

External sources (not reviewed)

Sanctions were intensified after the 1990 elections, which the opposition National League for Democracy won in a landslide, but the results of which were never implemented.

Villa sit in 16th place ahead of this weekend’s clash, just three points above the danger zone, but Wigan are currently third bottom and have lost their last three games in a row.

Some Member States, however, favoured a new crosscutting approach for this subject, on the understanding that it would be set up as an authentic intersectoral activity.

[...] [...] or structural collapse, the preparation [...] [...]

Yet another Member State suggested that evaluations of the ongoing CCT projects were urgently needed and that the allocation for those projects in document 33 C/5 should be reduced through the termination of non-performing projects.

That commentary might suggest, for example, that (f) the location from which financing was organized or authorized or the location of the debtor’s primary bank, would only be important where the bank controlled the debtor; that (k) the location of employees, might be important where employees could be future creditors, or less important on the basis that protection of employees is more an issue of protecting the rights of interested parties, is not relevant to the COMI analysis and is, in any event addressed by article 22 of the Model Law; that (e) the jurisdiction whose law would apply to most disputes, was not sufficiently important to be a determining factor and could, in any event, be a jurisdiction unrelated to the place from which the debtor was managed or conducted its business, factors that were both considered to be more important than (e).

[...] who tore down the Berlin Wall to [...] [...]

It was pointed out that, while the grounds relating to public order and national security were certainly the most important, they were not the sole grounds, and that drawing up a supposedly exhaustive list of grounds for expulsion would unduly restrict the discretion that the expelling State must be allowed in order to determine those grounds.

[...] [...] Paraguayan national but was present in [...] [...]

For example, if gender norms reinforce early pregnancy, there may be lack of awareness of girls’ rights to education and equality among family members and of the health risks of pregnancy for young adolescents; lack of positive leadership by community elders, local teachers and political leaders regarding gender roles; lack of education regarding women’s rights and gender equality in national school curricula, coupled with forced pregnancy testing in schools or other policies that reinforce gender norms; national legislation that directly discriminates against women and girls or has a disproportionate adverse impact on them; economic pressures that contribute to early marriage and pregnancy; or a combination of the above.