▾

External sources (not reviewed)

[...] Guidelines” listing and discussing [...] [...]

[...] [...] document singled out Israel in the section [...]

The expenditures for extrabudgetary resources, which usually finance multi-year projects, are presented on an annual basis in order to reflect the actual management cycle of extrabudgetary resources.

[...] [...] reaffirming commitments made in the Durban Review Conference of April 2009, and the creation of a statistical system with disaggregated data [...]

[...] [...] and 6.4, we may transfer or disclose such information to the following parties within Hong Kong (except that the parties set out in Clause 6.5(a) below may be located [...]

In that regard, it was noted that the priority areas identified under that agenda item for each of the three subregions should be aligned with the list of priority areas included in the respective expected accomplishments (a) under components 2, 3 and 4.

During their visit, the Working Group found that the challenges faced by people of African descent in Portugal related mainly to their lack of recognition as a specific group in the national policy and legal framework; the lack of recognition of their positive contribution throughout history to the construction and development of the country; the lack of qualitative and quantitative disaggregated data by racial or ethnic origin; the existence of a circle of poverty, unequal access to education, public services, employment, as well as discrimination in the administration and functioning of the justice system; existence of racial profiling and police violence; underrepresentation in political and institutional decision-making processes, as well as the lack of special measures or affirmative action policies in Portugal for people of African descent or other minorities.

The outputs to be delivered under [...] [...]

The document also indicated the ODS to [...]

If a full submission of those items was not possible, the Committee would have expected that indicative estimates of the resource requirements, at a minimum, would have been reflected in the proposed programme budget in order to provide Member States with the most comprehensive information possible at the time.

[...] [...] true and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that [...]

Ordinary resolutions will also be proposed at the Annual General Meeting in respect of the granting of the Issue Mandate to the Directors, in the terms set out in the notice of the Annual General Meeting, to allot, issue and deal with Shares not exceeding 20% of the aggregate nominal amount of the share capital of the Company in issue as at the date of passing the relevant resolution, and adding to the Issue Mandate so granted to the Directors any Shares representing the aggregate nominal amount of the Shares repurchased by the Company after the granting of the Repurchase Mandate, at any time during the period ended on the earliest of (a) the conclusion of the next annual general meeting of the Company; (b) the expiration of the period within which the next annual general meeting of the Company is required by the Articles or any applicable laws to be held; and (c) the date upon which such authority is revoked or varied by an ordinary resolution at a general meeting of Shareholders.

More important, it will need to include clear targets and indicators according to the specificities of each parliament.

Furthermore, as noted in paragraph 2 above, pursuant to General Assembly resolution 63/266, the Secretary-General has included in his report a projection of the total budget for special political missions for the biennium 2010–2011, which he estimates could amount to some $1,148,739,700, or $319,811,300 more than the provision for special political missions in the proposed programme budget for the biennium 2010–2011 (see A/64/349, para. 78 and annex III).

[...] [...] of procurement listed in paragraph (1), [...] [...]

Some members have also suggested that the criterion set out in clause 31 for granting exemption on public policy grounds (i.e. exceptional and compelling reasons of public policy) should also apply and be incorporated into clause 5(1)(b) as a criterion for the Chief Executive (CE) in Council in exercising the power to exempt a non-statutory body from the Bill.

[...] [...] that the report set out the revised framework [...] [...]

Additionally, the view was expressed that names of delegations having minority views should be specified, not only when reservations were made on decisions, but also when they were made on any specific aspect of the discussion, so that the report could better inform Commission members who were not present at the session.

These include making available sales brochures to the public, disclosing in sales brochures the property information as required, specifying in printed advertisements the net number of units exclusively available for public sales and private sales, disclosing to the public the names of the developer, its parent or holding company, the Authorized Person, main superstructure contractor, solicitor firms and mortgagee bank, disclosing to the public in advertisements and sales brochures any personal and financial relationships between the developer and Authorized Person, solicitor and superstructure contractor, and so on.

The Lead IA will be responsible for carrying out the activities of the plan as detailed in the first submission of the HPMP with the changes approved as part of the subsequent tranche submissions, including but not limited to independent verification as per sub-paragraph 5(b).

[...] [...] which typically set out alleged facts, [...] [...]

[...] [...] opportunity to list solutions, match [...] [...]

(2) Notwithstanding any provision contained in these Articles, the Directors may, if permitted by applicable law, authorise the destruction of documents set out in subparagraphs (a) to (e) of paragraph (1) of this Article and any other documents in relation to share registration which have been microfilmed or electronically stored by the Company or by the share registrar on its behalf provided always that this Article shall apply only to the destruction of a document in good faith and without express notice to the Company and its share registrar that the preservation of such document was relevant to a claim.

[...] [...] account relevant proposals for action of [...] [...]

Therefore the ability for the IT team to be very specific on the advantages and cost savings of the new IGEL thin clients is key to convincing Branch Managers to upgrade their desktops at the right time.

From 1974 to 1977 (up to and including the resumed sixty-third session), the decisions were numbered consecutively and were identified by an arabic numeral followed by an indication of the session in parentheses (for example: decision 64 (ORG-75), decision 78 (LVIII), adopted at the organizational session for 1975 and the fifty-eighth session, respectively).

All underlying transactions are exempt under Rule 14A.33 of the Listing Rules and the summary is provided to comply with SSAP 20 “Related Party Disclosures” by reason that certain Directors of the Company are also directors of WICL.

[...] [...] enactment” setting forth background and [...] [...]