▾

External sources (not reviewed)

[...] source submits that Mr. Alkhodr’s deprivation of liberty is arbitrary [...] [...]

This morning we observed the International Day of Solidarity with the Palestinian People, an occasion for renewing our commitment to the realization of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people — primarily the right to self-determination and the right to an independent State — and for reaffirming our support to a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East.

The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Al-Hassani was arbitrary, and constitutes a breach [...] [...]

The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Al-Murbati is arbitrary, falling under categories I and III of the Working Group, being without legal basis and in violation of articles 9 and 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

[...] [...] justification for the claim that the penalty of deprivation of nationality, imposed in this case for the [...] [...]

On the contrary, the complainant first contests the domestic authorities’ assessment of the facts, then describes in general terms the human rights situation in Togo before claiming, on the basis of his own assessment of the facts, that [...] [...]

The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Gellani on both occasions is arbitrary, being in violation [...] [...]

For a person deprived of liberty by the police [...] [...]

[...] [...] starting with the earthquake, which claimed the lives of 230,000 [...] [...]

[...] [...] Representative for Afghanistan, to reiterate the priorities set out by the Security Council in its resolution 1917 (2010) and to display solidarity with the women and men of the United Nations [...]

3.1 The author claims that the Minister’s refusal to register Mr. Gonzalez as a citizen of [...] [...]

The Government of the Sudan first of all affirms its sincere desire to [...] [...]

( b ) The realization of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, primarily the right to self-determination and the right to their independent State

[...] [...] as a document of the General Assembly under agenda [...]

[...] [...] of needs and priorities should be based on an appreciation of the differential impact of conflict on women and men and boys and girls, and of the potential for prevailing gender relations to affect efforts to rebuild effective and equitable institutions; (c) resource [...] [...]

[...] public order, advance notification [...]

In its Views in Stewart v. Canada,3 after mentioning this problem of denationalization, the Committee identified other types of manipulation of nationality law that should not be permitted to circumvent the protection of article 12, paragraph 4, such as cases “of individuals whose country of nationality has been incorporated into or transferred to another national entity whose nationality is being denied them,” and possibly “stateless persons arbitrarily deprived of the right to acquire the nationality of the country of such residence.

(a) Reduce prison overcrowding by favouring non-custodial penalties in its policy on crime, including probation, suspended sentences, community service, along with avenues of out-of-court dispute settlement, such as mediation.

In accordance with article 11 of the Rules and Regulations, claims are eligible for inclusion in the Register if: (a) the claimant is a natural or legal person; (b) the claimant has substantially met the technical requirements for submitting a claim; (c) the claim is within the jurisdiction of the Register of Damage; (d) the claimant has established a legal interest in the claimed damage; (e) the claimed damage is material; (f) the claimant has established a causal link between the claimed damage and the construction of the Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory; (g) the claimed damage was in fact sustained; (h) the documents and assertions in support of the claim are substantially consistent; and (i) the claim has been established prima facie, based on the information and documents submitted by the claimant, giving the claimant the benefit of the doubt in appropriate cases and bearing in mind the varying circumstances with regard to title and residency status of claimants.

According to other speakers, the rules set out in draft article B were not flexible enough or were too detailed: that was particularly the case with the requirement that the detention of an alien pending expulsion must be carried out in a place other than a facility in which persons sentenced to penalties involving deprivation of liberty were detained.

[...] [...] consent or acquiescence of the Government, followed by a refusal to disclose the fate or whereabouts of the persons concerned or a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of their liberty, which places such persons outside the protection of the law.

PLA Deputy Chief of Staff Ma Xiaotian then stated that U.S. actions could pose a threat to China’s national security, leading the ministry to revise its previous statement and say that the U.S. should not send navy ships.

[...] international staff in the UNESCO office, its spotty reputation for programme delivery in the past, the absorption [...] [...]

The Migration Court further noted that the event which the complainant claimed was the direct cause for her to flee Burundi occurred nearly three years ago, a period that was considered to be relatively long.