▾

External sources (not reviewed)

[...] [...] on thebasis of falserealitiesor in [...]

In this connection, the Committee reiterates its concern about the flexible interpretation of the guidelines for the use of funds appropriated for general temporary assistance, which are intended to be used for the temporary replacement of staff on extended sick leave or maternity leave or the engagement of additional staff during peak workload periods, and not to finance de facto regular budget posts that are of a continuing nature (see, inter alia, A/50/7/Add.2).

(d) To advise on medico-administrative issues, including medical aspects of sick leave, the evaluation and certification of sickleave for staff [...][...]

Rule 105.3 (Home leave) has been amended through the addition of two new paragraphs (k) and (l) so as to allow for some flexibility in the use of the entitlement to home leave and also so as to balance the demands of professional life and family life, by giving the staff members concerned the opportunity to visit, in the context of home leave, a second country where they have close family ties.

[...] [...] “fatherland”, as false and having the [...][...]

It prohibits stealing, cheating, fraud, deception and other forms of dishonesty or trickery to acquire anything including money, influence, unfair advantage, jobs, competitive information or the approval of others.

Although arms are smuggled across borders — for example between the United States and Mexico — most weapons are just shipped through commercial channels, relying on fraudulent papers and corrupt officials.

[...] [...] supplementary annual paid leave, as well as other leave periods (which are longer) than those provided [...]

Not too much should be read into the exact value of these figures, which depend on a number of debateable assumptions, but it can safely be said that the effect of applying patent rights globally will be to benefit very considerably the holders of patent rights, mainly in developed countries, at the expense of the users of protected technologies and goods in developing countries.

[...] [...] make market based assumptions(Level 3).

[...] [...] reductions,includingassumptions madewhen presenting [...][...]

[...] [...] the fundamental assumptionsmade: theimportance [...]

One of the most compelling studies was a report discussing the hypothesized effects of fisheries management on safety in Iceland, including the special line of dispensation and days of effort.

[...] of the abovekey assumptions would notcause the [...][...]

These assumptionsportray aspecific [...][...]

[...] based on theclear assumption of responsibility [...][...]

[...] [...] the basis of an assumption that by2025, [...][...]

Based on our discussions with the Directors and the Valuer regarding the principal valuation assumptionsconsidered in the fair value of certain principal items, we have no reason to believe the principal valuation assumptions are unreasonable in material aspect and we consider that the Valuation Report has been prepared by the Valuer on a reasonable basis without any unusual [...][...]

[...] arise because the assumptionsthat mustbe made [...]

As to the assumption that Alexander Blücher would not have been entitled to claim restitution under the Land Act because he was allegedly not a Czech citizen and therefore would not have fulfilled the criteria under the Land Act, the “logic” behind this reasoning is based on a hypothetical application of a discriminatory citizenship requirement to the original owner as if he were the applicant under the Act.

In accordance with article 11 of the Rules and Regulations, claims are eligible for inclusion in the Register if: (a) the claimant is a natural or legal person; (b) the claimant has substantially met the technical requirements for submitting a claim; (c) the claim is within the jurisdiction of the Register of Damage; (d) the claimant has established a legal interest in the claimed damage; (e) the claimed damage is material; (f) the claimant has established a causal link between the claimed damage and the construction of the Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory; (g) the claimed damage was in fact sustained; (h) the documents and assertions in support of the claim are substantially consistent; and (i) the claim has been established prima facie, based on the information and documents submitted by the claimant, giving the claimant the benefit of the doubt in appropriate cases and bearing in mind the varying circumstances with regard to title and residency status of claimants.

[...] to guardagainstassumptions about the inherent [...][...]

[...] [...] domestic product) —assuming employment would follow [...][...]

[...] [...] identify anyunusual assumption and methodologies [...][...]

Hence, apart from the scenarioenvisaged in draft guideline 4.3.2, the effective entry into force of the treaty as between the author of the objection and the author of the reservation is in no way dependent on the objection itself, but rather on the establishment of the reservation, which is completely beyond the control of the author of the objection.

Indeed, it appears that, insofar as the European Communities Treaty is concerned, public order does not provide States with general grounds for intervention and may not be invoked outside the situations expressly envisaged: “In order to avail themselves of article 36 [new article 30], member States must observe the limitations imposed by that provision both as regards the objective to be attained and as regards the nature of the means used to attain it.