▾

External sources (not reviewed)

At 0800 hours, an armed terrorist group detonated an explosive device as a bus carrying personnel on leave was passing along the Qusayr road.

[...] [...] requested for maternity/sick leave replacement.

[...] [...] positions for maternity and sick leave, as well [...] [...]

During the discussions held during the last session of the Executive Board concerning the rationality of analysing the staff costs by main line of action, the Secretariat informed the Members that the staff costs are as a matter of fact budgeted and managed at the principal line of appropriation, thus an artificial distribution of staff costs budget and expenditures at the level of main line of action was likely to lead to unrealistic analyses.

The positive experience with the development of high quality research within the dummies in Automobile Technology (FAT), five German car manufacturers organized in the PDB, and various software vendors, including ESI, prompted the development of a "WorldSID 50th " Finite cooperate element (FE) model.

[...] [...] a reaction to assumed or factual misdemeanours [...]

The phrase “individuals from other vulnerable groups are carried out” should be replaced with “other individuals on the grounds or”.

Later a woman posing as Conan’s [...]

In this connection, the Committee reiterates its concern about the flexible interpretation of the guidelines for the use of funds appropriated for general temporary assistance, which are intended to be used for the temporary replacement of staff on extended sick leave or maternity leave or the engagement of additional staff during peak workload periods, and not to finance de facto regular budget posts that are of a continuing nature (see, inter alia, A/50/7/Add.2).

In accordance with article 11 of the Rules and Regulations, claims are eligible for inclusion in the Register if: (a) the claimant is a natural or legal person; (b) the claimant has substantially met the technical requirements for submitting a claim; (c) the claim is within the jurisdiction of the Register of Damage; (d) the claimant has established a legal interest in the claimed damage; (e) the claimed damage is material; (f) the claimant has established a causal link between the claimed damage and the construction of the Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory; (g) the claimed damage was in fact sustained; (h) the documents and assertions in support of the claim are substantially consistent; and (i) the claim has been established prima facie, based on the information and documents submitted by the claimant, giving the claimant the benefit of the doubt in appropriate cases and bearing in mind the varying circumstances with regard to title and residency status of claimants.

(d) To advise on medico-administrative issues, including medical aspects of sick leave, the evaluation and certification of sick leave for staff worldwide, the provision of medical advice to the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund, the Advisory Board on Compensation Claims, the Field Budget and Finance Division (on compensation claims of troops) and the International Civil Service Commission (regarding medical aspects of hardship classifications of duty stations), advising the Administration on special dependency allowances for disabled children and special education grants for children with disabilities, and advising on health-related policies system-wide (in administrative instructions, information circulars, etc.).

[...] of the above key assumptions would not cause the [...] [...]

[...] formula was a fair assumption for the reimbursement [...] [...]

Apart from considering the views expressed in each submission and whether in principle at least the author was for or against an OPS or did not indicate either way, we took careful note of such points as: (a) whether the submission was from an individual or a group; (b) whether it was an ordinary letter or a pre-printed form; (c) if in support of the OPS, whether such support was qualified or unqualified, and if the former, to what extent; and (d) if the submissions opposed the OPS, whether it did so in principle or in respect of individual recommendations in the paper.

Save as disclosed above, as at the Latest Practical Date, the Directors are not aware of any other person who had an interest or short position in the Shares or underlying Shares of the Company which would fall to be disclosed to the Company under the provisions of Divisions 2 and 3 of Part XV of the SFO, or who was, directly or indirectly, interested in 10% or more of the nominal value of any class of share capital, or options in respect of such capital, carrying rights to vote in all circumstances at general meetings of any other member of the Group.