▾

External sources (not reviewed)

Moreover, applications to the judge (in the case ofinterception of communications andmore intrusive covert surveillance) [...][...]

It also noted that procedures for reporting casesof violence against children were extremely long and lacked comprehensive measures to respond and provide care to those affected.

[...] [...] repeated infringers, which may involve techniques for identifying such infringers andlimiting the bandwidth made availableto such infringers; or(c) implementing filtering technologiesto block infringingactivities.

[...] factors or criteria adopted for proposing the appointment of a panel of judges by the Chief Executive for authorizing interception of communications andthe more intrusivecovert surveillance operations, and the differences between the aforementioned proposed framework and the franework [...][...]

Ossur, a global leaderin non-invasive orthopaedics, announced today that LTC Greg Gadson was fit last week at Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) with the second generation of the POWER KNEE by Ossur, the first technology to use sensors, power, artificial intelligence and actuators to provide amputees with the ability to walk naturally and [...][...]

(a) the UK : in respect of interception andintrusive surveillance, offences for which a person who has attained the age of 21 and has no previous convictions could reasonably be expected to be sentenced to three years of imprisonment or more, or crimes that involve the use of [...][...]

Real signs of improvement had been seen in the conditions of indigenous peoples, victimsof violence and past abuses, and the institutional promotion of human rights in the country.

Ordinary resolutions will also be proposed at the Annual General Meeting in respect of the granting of the Issue Mandate to the Directors, in the terms set out in the notice of the Annual General Meeting, to allot, issue and deal with Shares not exceeding 20% of the aggregate nominal amount of the share capital of the Company in issue as at the date of passing the relevant resolution, and adding to the Issue Mandate so granted to the Directors any Shares representing the aggregate nominal amount of the Shares repurchased by the Company after the granting of the Repurchase Mandate, at any time during the period ended on the earliest of (a) the conclusion of the next annual general meeting of the Company; (b) the expiration of the period within which the next annual general meeting of the Company is required by the Articles or any applicable laws to be held; and (c) the date upon which such authority is revoked or varied by an ordinary resolution at a general meeting of Shareholders.

[...] [...] authorizing (i) all interceptionof communications and (ii) themoreintrusive covert surveillance [...][...]

Save asdisclosed above, at no time during the six months ended 30 June 2002 was the Company or any of its subsidiaries a party to any arrangements to enable the directors or the chief executive of the Company to acquire benefits by means of acquisition of shares in, or debt securities (including debentures) of, the Company or any other body corporate and none of the directors, the chief executive, their spouses or children under the age of 18, had any rights to subscribe for securities of the Company, or had exercised any such rights during the period.

[...] Shares shall, save asprovided for in these provisions, rank pari passu in all respects with the Ordinary Shares in issue at the time the Conversion Shares are issued, and shall, subject to the proviso of paragraph 5(C) in this Bye-law 6(C) and this paragraph 7, entitle the holders thereof to all distributions paid or made on the Ordinary Shares by reference to a Record Date falling after the Conversion Date, provided that if a Record Date after the Conversion Date is in respect of any distribution in respect of any financial period of the Companyended priorto such [...][...]

[...] [...] for authorizinginterception of communications and themore intrusive covert surveillance, [...][...]

I do not steal the glass from you every time I use it without your permission.

They benefit from the high cost of litigation by demanding license fees that are less than the cost of litigation, hoping that people will pay even if they don’t infringe, or, if they do infringe, it will be too costly to change the product.

[...] [...] public body or infringecopyright.

(vi) representations and warranties of the Investorand the Company being true and correct in all material respects as of the date of the Investor Subscription Agreement and as of the Investor Closing Date as though made at that time (except for representations and warranties that speak as of a specific date, which will be true and correct as of such specified date), and the Investor and the Company having performed, satisfied andcompliedinallmaterialrespectswith the covenants, agreements and conditions required by the Investor Subscription Agreement to be performed, satisfied or complied with by Investor and the Company at or prior to the Investor Closing Date.

[...] [...] unusual degree ofinfringement of the privacy [...][...]

[...] [...] rights and evaluation of authorcontracts: ALD until the [...][...]

Even though the conduct violates several rights, including the right to recognition as a person before the law, the right to liberty and security of the person and the right not to be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and alsoviolates orconstitutes a grave threat to the right to life, the Working Group considers that an enforced disappearance is a unique and consolidated act, and not a combination of acts.

UNESCO’s International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP) is contributing substantially to this expected result, notably through its field operations and training programmes targeting educationplanners and managers (some 800 trained to date in 2010) and technical assistance for the development of national plans based on a capacity development approach that emphasizes “learning by doing”.

[...] [...] impunityforviolations committed against human rights defendersand journalists byboth State and non-State actors, and in some cases by allegations of State actors colluding directlywithperpetrators.