▾

External sources (not reviewed)

[...] is a needfora second green revolutionforotherfood [...][...]

[...] knowledge-intensive second ‘‘green revolution’’ based on sustainable [...]

[...] [...] tolerance of the Second Industrial Revolution’s great industrial [...][...]

Hence both revolutions did not consider [...]

[...] laws; it is followedby the Gemara, or secondpartof the Talmud, [...]

MA Ying-jeou oncesaid he would launch areform,and Radio Television [...][...]

On 9 December 2004, pursuant to a resolution adopted at the Company’s secondtemporaryshareholders’ generalmeeting and the provision under the revised Articles of Association, and [...][...]

Consequently, the technologicalrevolution for a green economy will be fundamentally different from previous revolutions — in three ways.

[...] [...] announced the reappointment of Wynet Smith (Canada, natural resources expert and Coordinator) and the appointment of two new experts, [...][...]

The green revolution of the 1960s and 1970s bypassed many small farm holders in developing countries because of its focus on a single technological package — one that did not address the context-specific conditions of millions of farmers, mainly in Africa.

[...] [...] and criminal justicesystem reforms; secondly, they have helped countries [...][...]

tion in nature, and that socialists should not participate.

[...] [...] after my appointment,and the second timefor the meeting [...][...]

[...] [...] and services; and second, the ongoingdigital revolution will increase [...][...]

FARC-EP, in particular, has resorted to collective threats in a systematic manner, obstruction of the freedom of movement of persons and goods, and, in general, enforcement of strong social control in areas of their influence, limiting overall freedom.

In the agreement between Croatia and the Executive Committee, the maximum allowable consumption for Annex A, Group I (CFCs) for the year 2005 was 65 ODP tonnes, for 2010 0 ODP tonne; and for the years in between, the agreement provides no exact figure but stipulates that "The By-Law on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (of 30 January 1999) includes a clause on importing on an exceptional basis between 2006 and 2009 up to 21.9 ODP tonnes of Annex A (Groups I and II) and/or Annex B (GroupsII and III) or products containing these substances, when these substances and/or products are for preserving human, plant and/or animal life; national defence, safety and fire-fighting; and scientific research safety, when such products cannot be replaced by environmentally-sound and economically-viable alternatives”.

[...] [...] combined initial, second and third periodic [...][...]

[...] [...] JIU/REPORT/2006/4A secondreview ofthe implementation [...][...]

On the question of the interaction, at this stage, with States, the Special Rapporteur noted that it might be useful to receive their detailed comments in the Sixth Committee on the debate at the present session, taking into account in particular thesecond report, as well as information on State practice, including legislation and court decisions on the issues raised in the second and third reports and in the debate.

In accordance with the provisions of the International Covenant on economic, social and cultural rights and following the recommendations on the form and contents of the periodic reports of the States Parties, and taking into account the provisions of the Decision of the Parliament of the Republic of Moldova on the approval of the National Human Rights Action Plan for years 2004–2008, No. 415-XV from 24 October 2004, and the Governmental Decision on the National Committee responsible for the approval of the initial and periodic Reports No. 225 from 01 March 2006, herewith is the second periodic Report on the implementation of the International UN Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Republic of Moldova for years 2001–2007.