▾

External sources (not reviewed)

Section II, title X, article 328 of the Family Code states: “When the health, safety, morality or education of a minor are jeopardized or insufficiently protected owing to the immoral behaviour or disability of the father and mother or of the person accorded the right of guardianship, or when, owing to misconduct or unruly behaviour, a minor gives these individuals cause for very serious dissatisfaction or renders them incapable of exercising guidance, the juvenile judge may on his own initiative, at the behest of the [...] [...]

[...] [...] it should not obscure the fact that the determination of when immunity was excluded was different, the issue in the latter case being one of treaty interpretation.

[...] [...] secretary or cabin crew member and would not take her seriously.

It should be recalled in this context that the introduction of a modern HR management information system has been a major challenge across the entire United Nations system with differing approaches ranging from internally [...] [...]

Norman refuses to take him seriously, but soon has another vision during the school play, [...] [...]

[...] [...] Union Member States already followed that approach and there was no issue of them being in violation of the IPR Enforcement Directive; (c) such an approach would be justified on the basis of expectations of the parties to security agreements (not [...] [...]

. He may, however, collect evidence in two situations: at the request of a party or a victim participating in the proceedings, when the requesting party or the victim demonstrates, on a balance of probabilities, that it is not in a position to collect the evidence itself, and the Pre-Trial Judge considers that doing so would be in the interests of justice (rule 92 (A)); and secondly, where a party or a victim participating in the proceedings is unable to collect “an important piece of evidence” that the Pre-Trial Judge deems indispensable to the fair administration of justice, the equality of arms and the search for truth (rule 92 (C)).

[...] of the Company in issue as at the date of passing the relevant resolution and adding to such general mandate so granted to the Directors any Shares representing the aggregate nominal amount of Shares repurchased by the Company under the Repurchase Mandate and (ii) a Repurchase Mandate to purchase Shares not exceeding 10% of the aggregate [...] [...]

[...] production of the IOC draft input to the 32 C/5 is an innovation that seeks to align better the governance of the Commission with that of UNESCO i.e. the input is endorsed by an IOC governing body and is no longer a product of the work [...]

The problem now is that the amendment will deprive the policy of its core and most vital element and, that is, no cap will be imposed.

It should also be recalled that the decision for the establishment of a programme of work for the 2009 session of the Conference on Disarmament (CD/1864), which represents the only programme of work that the members of the Conference on Disarmament [...] [...]

[...] [...] about her and to return to hear stories before heading back with Tinker Bell to Neverland.

[...] [...] Commission’s draft is intended to cover the effect of armed conflicts either between parties to the treaty that are also parties to the armed conflict, or between a single State party to the conflict and a “third” State, that is, a State [...]

When a Category R CBBC expires early due to the occurrence of a mandatory call event, the holder may receive a small residual value payment, but there may be no residual value payment in some situations.

Lastly, as regards the interpretation of the contract where it concerned the specific features that the machine in question was required to have, the Court held that the aim of article 8.1 of CISG in introducing the rule or subjective criterion of interpretation was to discern the real intent of a contracting party — without going so far as a psychological investigation — so that, if the terms of the contract were clear, there was an obligation to abide by the literal meaning, without either party being able to claim that its unstated wishes should prevail.

[...] that “we will not shy away” from the magnitude of the challenges of promoting and protecting human rights, the Security Council appears unable [...] [...]

[...] [...] by not eluding the cause of the grave humanitarian crisis in Kosovo, underlying not only the adoption of Security Council resolution 1244(1999), [...] [...]

[...] [...] harmonized rate of seven per cent is derived, remains appropriate; (ii) core donors currently bear an undue share of organizational costs; and (iii) the cost-recovery rate for each organization lends itself to harmonization.

However, when the provincial women candidates approached the local authorities, the women and their security concerns were dismissed or mocked, and they were told that such protection would be a waste of resources.

[...] [...] server), and Copyback Hot Spare (when a failed drive has been replaced, data is automatically copied from the hot spare [...]

[...] [...] relevant United Nations resolutions and the agreements reached between the parties, and concerned particularly about Israel’s construction and expansion of settlements in and around occupied East Jerusalem, including its so-called E-1 plan that aims to connect its illegal settlements around and further isolate [...] [...]

[...] [...] delivery; improved access to land and other productive natural assets; reduced gender barriers to financial services; and increased knowledge for men and women enabling them to participate in and obtain appropriate returns from the agricultural system.

[...] on the Security Council and all concerned parties to make the necessary efforts and work to ensure the effective implementation of the resolution in order to bring an end to all military activities and violence; to address the serious humanitarian and economic needs of the Palestinian civilian population in the Gaza Strip, who for too long have been under Israel’s inhumane siege; and to help the parties return from the precipice to which this crisis has brought us and back to the path [...]

[...] [...] with Shares not exceeding 20% of the aggregate nominal amount of the share capital of the Company in issue as at the date of passing the relevant resolution, and adding to the Issue Mandate so granted to the Directors any Shares representing the aggregate nominal amount of the Shares repurchased by the Company after the granting of the Repurchase Mandate, at any time during the period ended on the earliest of (a) the conclusion of the next annual general meeting of the [...] [...]

The other powers of the Pre-Trial Judge include: (a) evaluating the charges brought by the Prosecutor in the indictment and, if need be, (b) requesting the Prosecutor to reduce or reclassify such charges; (c) facilitating communication between the parties; (d) issuing summonses, warrants and other orders at the request of either party; (e) questioning anonymous witnesses; (f) drawing up a complete file for the Trial Chamber listing the main differences between the parties on points of law and fact, and indicating his views regarding the main points of fact and law arising in the case.

[...] [...] institutions, in particular anti-corruption bodies and criminal justice institutions, to effectively prevent and control corruption in an integrated and coordinated way; (c) enhancing integrity, accountability and transparency in public and private sectors, including the management of public resources; (d) supporting relevant Government institutions in international cooperation and the recovery of assets at the domestic and international levels; (e) development [...] [...]

[...] [...] treaty or to certain of its provisions” — which corresponds to the definition of “interpretative declaration” — and another to determine whether the interpretation proposed therein is valid, or, in other words, whether the “meaning or scope attributed by the declarant to a treaty or to certain of its provisions” is valid.

The introductory report addressed a number of questions including: terminological issues; the general significance of subsequent agreements and practice in treaty interpretation; the question of inter-temporal law; the relationship between evolutionary interpretation and subsequent agreements and practice; the various elements of subsequent agreements and practice, including: the beginning and the end of the relevant period within which this phenomenon may take place, the identification of a common understanding or agreement by the parties, including the potential role of silence, questions of attribution of conduct to the State; as well as subsequent agreements and practice as a possible means of treaty modification.