▾

External sources (not reviewed)

Thirty-two per cent of respondents qualified the feedback they received from the GCO as poor or they had no opinion, while 76 per cent reported that the quality of information they received from the GCO was “very good” or “good.

There would therefore be no comment on the absurd media reports appearing recently to the effect that a Georgian general had ordered an attack on Tskhinvali, the capital of South Ossetia, as civilians slept, without first securing the approval of the Georgian authorities.

[...] implemented are discussed in depth and are evaluated continuously by [...]

[...] attention to the complainant’s comments, but nonetheless considers that her arguments have not been sufficiently substantiated [...] [...]

[...] [...] entirely conclusive; however, he concluded that the assessment findings might substantiate that he had been subjected [...]

[...] [...] Site, including, without limitation, questions, comments, suggestions, ideas, plans, notes, drawings, configurations, specifications, purchase orders, quotes or requests for quotes, performance data, account information, or other material, data or information (collectively, "Information"), are non-confidential and upon transmission of such information to QUADRANT via email or other means you grant to QUADRANT [...] [...]

[...] [...] who are found present on its territory, regardless of their nationality and the place where [...]

[...] [...] taken into account in the evaluation of the risk for the complainant in the [...]

[...] ESCAP does not identify the comments of any individuals.

The Inspectors welcomed the comments of the Board of Auditors and the Secretary-General on the JIU report, contained in their respective reports (A/66/151 and A/66/379) and noted that a member of the IPSAS Board from the private sector had referred positively to the set of 16 best practices at a recent conference on IPSAS implementation.

Agencies indicated several possible reasons for the low ratings largely due to changes in NOUs, misunderstandings about the evaluation timeframe as issues raised related to previous years, delays assigned to the agency but which were a result of data inconsistencies by the country, comments on the lead agency when the agency concerned was not the lead agency, dissatisfaction expressed on the agency’s performance that related to the funding received from the Executive Committee for the HPMP, ratings were withdrawn, comments on the hiring of national consultants when no consultants were hired or were to be hired, and delays assigned to the agency but which were the result of changes in the Government.

[...] [...] organizations have not been expressly covered either in the articles on the responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts or in the draft articles on the responsibility of international organizations”; some examples of these issues were given; and the Commission asked for comments and observations from Governments [...] [...]

[...] [...] and "also the treatises of all orthodox Fathers, who deviated in nothing from the fellowship of the holy Roman Church, and were not separated from her faith and preaching, but were participators through the grace of God until the end of their life in her communion; also the decretal letters, which most blessed popes have given at various [...] [...]

Except in cases of arrest or detention for penal offences, such persons shall be released with the minimum delay possible and in any event as soon as the circumstances justifying the arrest, detention or internment have ceased to exist.

[...] [...] together with the comments of the state concerned thereon, will be noted.

[...] [...] of Arbitrators (SIArb) and that, accordingly, any legal action arising out of or in connection with this Agreement (“Proceedings”) may be brought in those courts and the parties irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of those courts PROVIDED THAT nothing in this Clause shall limit the right of any party to take Proceedings in any other court of competent jurisdiction nor shall the taking of Proceedings in one or more jurisdictions preclude that party from taking Proceedings in any other jurisdiction, whether concurrently or not.

Secondly, with regard to article 41.1 (e) of the Act (MAL art. 34, para. 2 (b) (i)) and the argument that the dispute was not capable of settlement by arbitration on the grounds that company agreements affecting the structural aspects of a company — in this case, the necessary amendment of the company statutes to comply with the Valencian Cooperatives Law — could not be subjected to arbitration, the Court considered that the appeal actually related not to that but to irregularities in the adoption of the agreement and, in particular, the infringement of the article in the company statutes that stipulated the percentage of votes required for the adoption of an agreement; and that question was entirely arbitrable.

[...] [...] and assisting victims, regardless of their origin, religion [...]

[...] [...] for numerous reasons: the main statute: the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), requires that the rights and interests claimed be capable of recognition under the common law in section 223(1)(c); case law also continues to provide interpretive guidance complementing the reading of the legislation in general; and finally, there is a persuasive body of judicial and academic commentary contrasting the common law concept of communal native title to statutory native title rights and interests.

The Working Group reminds States of article 18 of the Declaration, as well as of its general comment thereon, according to which persons who have or who are alleged to have committed acts of enforced disappearance shall not benefit from any special amnesty law or similar measures that might have the effect of exempting them from any criminal proceedings or sanction.

The State party also argues that the PRRA officer was right not to attach weight to the affidavits submitted in support of the complainant, since they either came from persons who were biased or contained inaccuracies.

[...] [...] relevant commodity standards11 , the Delegation of the Netherlands clarified that the provision of some food additives in the GSFA, such as phosphates in powdered sugar, ferrocyanides in salt, had been grouped together because they were assigned a group ADI in JECFA evaluation.

While he thanked donors both small and large, and in particular the United States, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Union, he called on all donors to contribute generously to UNRWA to overcome the funding shortfall.

[...] [...] the Company and whether or not the assets shall consist [...] [...]

[...] [...] either taken together or viewed in isolation, logically and ineluctably lead to the conclusion espoused in the present Advisory Opinion, namely, that the authors of the DoI [...] [...]

[...] [...] established by the Commission in its resolution 51/4, and their conclusions to be taken into account by the Commission at its intersessional [...] [...]

[...] [...] resident I just had to comment on the big new [...] [...]

[...] [...] reviewing applications, identifying candidates for further assessment by subject matter experts, that is, expert panels, serving [...] [...]

[...] [...] the written comments of Governments, [...] [...]