[...] submitted by ABeamM&A Consulting do not represent [...][...]

The following examplescould bementioned: (a)the extension of the effectiveness of a registration (renewal of a registration); (b) the deletion of a secured creditor where two or more secured creditors are identified in the registered notice; (c) the addition of a secured creditor; (d) the deletion of a grantor when two or more grantors are identified in the registered notice; (e) the addition of a grantor; (f) the deletion of encumbered assets; (g) the modification of the identifier of the grantor; (h) the modification of the identifier of the secured creditor; (i) the assignment of the secured obligation by the secured creditor; (j) the subordination by the secured creditor; (k) the subrogation of a secured creditor’s right; (l) the modification of the address of a grantor or secured creditor; and (m) the modification in the maximum monetary amount for which the security right maybe enforced [...]

[...] through-hole for M10 screws, Figure 37).

[...] the establishment ofthe "M"Mark System [...][...]

(d) Another ex-M23 officer who surrendered from Ntaganda’s position at Runyoni told the Group that he personally witnessed how one RDF battalion came to reinforce the mutineers after a FARDC helicopter bombarded their positions.

(m) Review the progress of implementation by MINUSTAH of the force reduction authorized by the Security Council in its resolution 2012 (2011), assess planning to encourage greater Haitian ownership of security and reconstruction activities and examine the potential for adjustments to MINUSTAH force configuration based on the overall improved security situation on the ground, taking into account the impact of social and political realities on stability and security, the increasing development of Haitian State capabilities, including the ongoing strengthening of the Haitian National Police, and the increasing exercise by the national authorities of their responsibility for the maintenance of stability and security.

securities issued by the Company as permitted by Section 73A of the Ordinance (and no signature of any Director, officer or other person and no mechanical reproduction thereof shall be required on any such certificates or other document and any such certificates or other document to which such official seal is affixed shall be valid and deemed to have been sealed and executed with the authority of the Board notwithstanding the absence of any such signature or mechanical reproduction as aforesaid) and an official seal for use abroad under the provisions of the Companies Ordinance where and as the Board shall determine, and the Company may by writing under the seal appoint any agents or agent, committees or committee abroad to be the duly authorised agents of the Company for the purpose of affixing and using such official seal and they may impose such restrictions on the use thereof as may be thought fit.

After discussion, the Working Group agreed that the questions for further consideration on that matter would include(A/CN.9/717, para. 143): (i) whether a provision on protection of the integrity of the arbitral process should be in the form of a general formulation or should contain specific instances that were meant to be specifically addressed; (ii) the interplay between the protection of the integrity of the arbitral process and the provisions in the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules already dealing with that issue; and (iii) how to determine the threshold for a limitation to transparency based on the ground of the need to protect integrity of the arbitral process.

Clause 11 of the Bill proposes to add sections 67(2A) and 67(2B) to the effect that at the end of the trial of an election petition that relates to the inclusion of the name of a person in, or the exclusion of the name of a person from a precedence list, CFI must determine whether the name is to be included in the list, and at the end of the trial of an election petition that relates to the ranking of a person on a precedence list, CFI must determine whether the ranking of the person on the list is correct and, if not correct, what is the correct ranking.

According to Rule 17.42A(1) of the GEM Listing Rules, any controlling Shareholders and their associates or, where there are no controlling Shareholders, Directors (excluding independent nonexecutive Directors) and the chief executive of the Company and their respective associates (as defined in the GEM Listing Rules) shall abstain from voting in favour of the resolution to approve the General Mandate and such resolution shall be voted on by way of a poll.

(m) Recognized also the importance of active engagement from other States Members of the United Nations which are not members of the Special Committee in the work of the Committee, and in that connection welcomed the participation of Algeria, Argentina, Costa Rica, Morocco and Spain in the seminar.

Dominican investments by Grupo M in the border area between Ouanaminthe and Dajabón have generated over 8,000 jobs for Haitians in Haiti.

2.4 In 2005, while watching the news from Azerbaijan, H.M. allegedly recognized the National Security Service officer who had assaulted her and who is now a high-ranking official in the department of border control.

In 2005, the Russian Federation launched 26 carrier rockets and 35 objects into space, of which 19 were Russian: two manned spaceships of the Soyuz TMA series (Nos. 6 and 7), four cargo vehicles of the Progress-M series (Nos. 52, 53, 54 and 55), two communications satellites of the Ekspress-AM series (Nos. 2 and 3), one satellite of the new Gonets-M series, six satellites of the Cosmos series (including three GLONASS satellites), the Foton M biotechnology satellite, the Monitor-E Land Remote Sensing Satellite, the Tatyana educational satellites of Moscow State University and the technological nanosatellite TNS-O.

a) CFS Headquarter at 43/F, Queensway [...][...]

(m) What measures have been successful in preventing secondary and repeated victimization of migrants, migrant workers and their families?

In response, it was stated that the concern about equal treatment of right holders was not valid, since: (a) the rule under discussion addressed the issue of the law applicable to security rights and not the substantive rights of right holders; (b) European Union Member States already followed that approach and there was no issue of them being in violation of the IPR Enforcement Directive; (c) such an approach would be justified on the basis of expectations of the parties to security agreements (not intellectual property right holders) associated with existing intellectual property registries; and (d) the Guide already followed that approach with respect to tangible assets (see recommendations 203 and 205).

[...] [...] I now move under paragraph 37A of the FC Procedure [...][...]

The Security Council, in its resolution 1810 (2008), decided that the Committee should continue to intensify its efforts to promote the full implementation by all States of resolution 1540 (2004) through its programme of work, which includes the compilation of information on the status of States’ implementation of all aspects of resolution 1540 (2004), outreach, dialogue, assistance and cooperation, and which addresses in particular all aspects of paragraphs 1 and 2 of that resolution, as well as of paragraph 3, which encompasses (a) accountability, (b) physical protection, (c) border controls and law enforcement efforts and (d) national export and trans-shipment controls, including controls on providing funds and services such as financing to such export and trans-shipment.

[...] [...] sea (tobe issuedas A/66/70/Add.1).

DONE at Washington, in a single copy which shall remain deposited in the archives of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which has indicated by its signature below its agreement to act as depository of this Agreement and to notify all governments whose names are set forth in Schedule A of the date when this Agreement shall enter into force under Article IX, Section 1 hereof.

(b) Each government shall become a member of the Corporation as from the date of the deposit on its behalf of the instrument referred to in paragraph (a) above except that no government shall become a member before this Agreement enters into force under Section 1 of this Article.

(m) In the situation where there is no indication that the second reading debate on a bill will resume within a reasonable time after completion of the Bills Committee’s work, the chairman or any member representing the Bills Committee shall, if the Bills Committee so determines, table a written report in the Council and seek the President’s permission to address the Council thereon under Rule 21(3) of the Rules of Procedure.

Vante, a leader in medical device equipment manufacturing and recently honored as 2011 Small Business Administration (SBA) Arizona Exporter of the Year, is rolling out a dynamic, choice-focused line up of cutting edge products and services at MD&M Minneapolis on November 2nd and 3rd.