The following examples could be mentioned: (a) the extension of the effectiveness of a registration (renewal of a registration); (b) the deletion of a secured creditor where two or more secured creditors are identified in the registered notice; (c) the addition of a secured creditor; (d) the deletion of a grantor when two or more grantors are identified in the registered notice; (e) the addition of a grantor; (f) the deletion of encumbered assets; (g) the modification of the identifier of the grantor; (h) the modification of the identifier of the secured creditor; (i) the assignment of the secured obligation by the secured creditor; (j) the subordination by the secured creditor; (k) the subrogation of a secured creditor’s right; (l) the modification of the address of a grantor or secured creditor; and (m) the modification in the maximum monetary amount for which the security right may be enforced (if applicable).

Under the particular circumstances of the case, the decision by the Netherlands to return X.H.L. to China constituted in itself a violation of article 24 of the Covenant, independently of whether or not the decision could do harm to the minor’s psychological well-being.

At the 42nd meeting, on 29 July, the observer for Maldives, on behalf of Australia, Cape Verde, Comoros, Cuba, Dominica, Fiji, Haiti, India, Israel, Japan, Luxembourg, Maldives, the Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, New Zealand, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Portugal, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Samoa, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Spain, Sri Lanka, Switzerland, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uruguay and Vanuatu, introduced a draftresolution entitled “Review of United Nations support for small island developing States” (E/2009/L.35).

In documentE/ICEF/2010/AB/L.3, UNICEFpresented [...][...]

[...] provisional calendar of conferences and [...][...]

[...] high-resolution file (approx. 10 x7cm at300 dpi).

Tall purple leather hamper(40 cm tall x 35 cm wide), with greenhouse [...][...]

If the Committee had decided thatthere was a “potential violation” owing to the fact that X.H.L. is still living in the Netherlands and has not actually been sent to China, it would then have failed to consider the violation itself.

The list of information to be included in the request for proposals has been amended: (a) the information listed in subparagraphs (d), (h), (l) and (o) has been deleted, as it was not relevant; (b) the remaining provisions have been amended to reflect the changes to the equivalent provisions regulating the contents of the solicitation documents in open tendering (see paragraph 9 above), and some related information has been grouped together for ease of reference; and (c) additional information has been included (in particular, regarding minimum responsiveness criteria, details of procedures, and (in request for proposals with dialogue) any elements that will not be the subject of dialogue and the minimum and maximum number of, and how to select, the suppliers or contractors to be invited to the dialogue).

[...] [...] 2007 (E/ICEF/2007/AB/L.12), 2008 (E/ICEF/2008/AB/L.10) and the first regular session of 2010 (E/ICEF/2010/AB/L.2), as well as verbal updates in 2009.

[...] [...] coordination segment, focused on the follow-up to the 2008 Ministerial Declaration on implementing [...][...]

Save as disclosed above, Mr. Fan does not have any other relationships with any directors, senior management, substantial shareholders or controlling shareholders of the Company and has not held any other directorships in listed public companies in the last three years and there is no other information to be disclosed pursuant to the requirements of Rule 17.50(2)(h) to 17.50(2)(x) of the GEM Listing Rules.

[...] [...] Signatory(ies) Change Form (CM(E)) in person to any [...]

(l) In so far as it is required by The Rules Governing the Listing of Securities on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited, a Director shall not vote (nor be counted in the quorum) on any resolution of the shareholders in respect of any contract or arrangement in which he is to his knowledge materially interested provided that this prohibition (a) shall not apply to any of the matters specified as (i) to (vii) inclusive in Article 100 (h) above; and (b) is also subject to any waiver which may be granted by the Stock Exchange.

In an innovative ruling, the High Court of Justice examined the issue of the fund allocation to sports institutions, and ruled that in order to redress long-standing inequality issues, local councils should allocate funds for women’s sports at 150% of that allocated to men’s sports (H.C.J 5325/01 L.C.N Association for the Advancement of Women Basketball v. Ramat-Hasharon Local Council).

That delegation called for proactive initiatives to remedy the situation and expressed strong support to the UNDP response to the financial and economic crisis in promoting the Global Jobs Pact as contained in Economic and Social Council decision E/2009/L24.