[...] [...] system’s security such as IBMAS/400, UNIX,Microsoft Windows and others; assisting in creation of IT audit methodologies [...][...]

Accordingly, if a shareholder wishes to nominate a person to stand for election as a Director of the Company at the general meeting, the following documents must be validly served on the Company Secretary at the principle office of the Company in Hong Kong, namely (i) his/her notice of intention to propose a resolution at the general meeting; and (ii) a notice signed by the nominated candidate of the candidate’s willingness to be appointed together with (a) that candidate’s information as required to be disclosed under rule 13.51(2) of the Listing Rules, and (b) the candidate’s written consent to the publication of his/her personal data.

(h) On the draft proposed CSA to Order 47 of the Rules of the District Court (Cap. 336H) set out in section 111 of Schedule 2 to the Bill (page 168 of LC Paper No. CB(1)2109/03-04(02)), the Administration confirmed that as in the case of Order 47 of the Rules of the High Court (Cap. 4A) (item 21 of the list of follow-up actions to be taken by the Administration arising from the thirty-fifth meeting of the Bills Committee on 11 June 2004), the expression “shall be taken and deemed to be a valid transfer of such right, title and interest and” would be deleted from rule 7(4)(b) of Order 47.

[...] [...] various discussions and events on the implementation of Security Council resolution 1325 (2000); (e) campaigns such as “Make Poverty History”; (f) public lectures on the abolition of war, women and development, anti-trafficking and demilitarization; (g) a peacebuilding symposium in Rwanda; (h) presentations to examine the impact of war on youth and to mark the sixtieth anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; (i) workshops for Somali youth in support of gender equality education, as called for in the Agreed Conclusions of the Commission on the Status of Women; (j) a public forum against nuclear weapons.

In accordance with article 11 of the Rules and Regulations, claims are eligible for inclusion in the Register if: (a) the claimant is a natural or legal person; (b) the claimant has substantially met the technical requirements for submitting a claim; (c) the claim is within the jurisdiction of the Register of Damage; (d) the claimant has established a legal interest in the claimed damage; (e) the claimed damage is material; (f) the claimant has established a causal link between the claimed damage and the construction of the Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory; (g) the claimed damage was in fact sustained; (h) the documents and assertions in support of the claim are substantially consistent; and (i) the claim has been established prima facie, based on the information and documents submitted by the claimant, giving the claimant the benefit of the doubt in appropriate cases and bearing in mind the varying circumstances with regard to title and residency status of claimants.

One trade representative enquired if a package of English Breakfast Tea Bags marked on the packaging that it contained a blend of Ceylon and Indian tea, was it acceptable not to have an ingredients list stating “Ceylon tea leaves and Indian tea leaves”.

These matters include the questions whether: (a)the grantor has to be the same person as the borrower; (b) the security agreement secures all the relevant obligations; (c) the security right is subject to any legal restrictions; (d) there must be a clear payment schedule in the credit; (e) there are any special rights or obligations (such as rights of way or rights of access to a site); (f) there are any special obligations for the preservation of encumbered assets; (g) there are any obligations not to transfer the encumbered asset or create another security [...][...]

The Committee on Contributions conducted its work on the basis of its general mandate, as contained in rule 160 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly; the original terms of reference of the Committee contained in chapter IX, section 2, paragraphs 13 and 14, of the report of the Preparatory Commission (PC/20) and in the report of the Fifth Committee (A/44), adopted during the first part of the first session of the General Assembly on 13 February 1946 (resolution 14 (I) A, para. 3); and the mandates contained in General Assembly resolutions 46/221 B, 48/223 C, 53/36 D, 54/237 C and D, 55/5 B and D, 57/4 B, 58/1 A and B, 59/1 A and B, 60/237, 61/2, 61/237 and 64/248.

[...] [...] and deemed to be a valid transfer ofsuchright, title [...]

[...] [...] A, X and others v Secretary of Statefor the Home Department.

[...] regard to the obligations contained in paragraph 3 (a) (i) of Security Council resolution 1591 (2005) referring to paragraphs7 and 8 ofSecurity [...][...]

[...] (a) theinflux ofunemployed returnees, including migrant workers, former combatants from Libya and armed Tuareg and Toubou elements into these countries, as well as the impact that their return is having on the socio-economic and political stability in the host communities; (b) the inflow of weapons into the region and the proliferation of small arms and light weapons, surface-to-air missiles and explosives; (c) the nature and the extent of criminal and terrorist activities in these countries and ongoing regional initiatives to address them; (d) the impact on the security sector; (e) the national operational capacity of the security sector; (f) judicial reform; (g) additional efforts needed to address the root causes of recurrent food insecurity and malnutrition, as well as other humanitarian issues; (h) youth unemployment; and (i) disaster risk [...]

Contractors were evaluated at levels A and B if they had provided raw data that could be used by the Authority for the purposes of environmental assessment and protection; levels C to E if they provided data or analysis that could be useful for regional environmental protection; and levels F to I if there were components within the environmental guidelines that had either not been evaluated or where the information collected was of little or no use for environmental assessment by the Authority.

The benchmarks adopted so far include: (a) adoption of a formal ERM policy since 2008; (b) an active enterprise risk management committee chaired by the Associate Administrator; (c) a formal implementation strategy for the adoption of ERM in UNDP; (d) dedicated training of staff on the policies and toolkits for ERM (e) clear procedures for the identification, reporting and escalation of relevant risks through the reporting lines for consideration by the ERM committee; (f) dedicated resources for monitoring of and follow up on the corporate risks log; (f) an enabling system for the reporting and review of unit-level and corporate risk; (h) progressively integrated risk-informed and results-based unit work-planning and reporting processes; (i) a planned and periodic review of ERM policies and practices; and (j) contributions to inter-agency experience exchange and learning based on the ERM experiences of UNDP.

[...] [...] paragraph (a) of this Article, or during any period ending on the date when all the requirementsof sub-paragraphs (i) to (iv) of paragraph [...][...]

UNDP agrees with the 13 JIU recommendations including (a)development of a comprehensive business case with consideration of alternative options; (b) negotiation with the host country government; (c) accounting for the full cost of offshoring; (d) establishment of project oversight teams; (e) seeking funding approval for potential separation liabilities linked to offshoring; (f) appropriate change management planning; (g) ensuring readiness [...][...]

During 2006: (a) World Social Forum,in January in Bamako; (b) ministerial meeting of Coordinating Office of NAM, in May in Malaysia; (c) World Peace Forum, in June in Vancouver, Canada; (d) civil society forum on creating an environment at the local and international levels to provide employment and decent work for all and its impact on sustainable development, in June in Geneva; (e) meeting of Arab Solidarity Committees, in August in Amman; (f) United Nations International Conference of Civil Society in Support of the Palestinian People, in September in Geneva; (g) fourteenth NAM Summit, in September in Havana; (h) International Solidarity Meeting with the People of the Middle East, in October in Larnaca, Cyprus; (i) Meeting on “Russia, Asia and Africa: 50 Years of Solidarity and Cooperation”, in November in Moscow; (j) Third Parallel Civil Conference of the Forum of the Future, in November in Amman.

Nor of course, would it enable Mr A to prevent Mrs A from revealing what Mr A had said toher ((a) (i)) or, what she had said to him ((a) (ii)) , if she chose to do so in the course of giving evidence on his behalf, (e.g. in cross examination) .