The relative standard deviations of the determination is less than 4.81 %.

样品测定的相对标准偏差均小于4.81%.

互联网

The ave rage recovery was 97.2 % with relative standard deviation of 3.4 %.

平均加样回收率97.2%,RSD为3.4%.

互联网

The combined relative standard uncertainty is 0 . 333 %.

合成相对标准不确定度为0.333%.

互联网

The relative standard deviations of Acid method were 2.38 % ~4.26 %.

而氨基酸测定方法的相对标准偏差在2.38%~4.26%之间,符合检测的要求.

互联网

Relative standard deviation of this method is below 3 %.

方法的相对标准差低于3%.

互联网

The relative standard deviation should be no greater than 2.0 %.

其相对标准偏差也应不大于2.0%.

互联网

The recoveries of 95 % ~104 % and relative standard deviations of less than 2 % were obtained. So the obtained results are reliable.

测定的相对标准偏差(RSD) 均小于2%,回收率为95%～104%,结果可信度高.

互联网

The Microwave Digestion provided relative standard deviations were all less 4.0 %, The average recoveries were 95.6 % ~112 %.

结果表明微波消解相对标准偏差均在4.0%以下, 加标回收率在95.6%~112%之间.

互联网

The method is simple and rapid. The relative standard deviation is 0.60 % - 0.67 % . The rate is 100 % - 103 % .

本法简便、快速,具有良好的准确度和精密度,相对标准偏差为0.60%—0.67%, 回收率为 100%—103%.

互联网

The results indi - cate that the recoveries were 100 % - 105 % and the relative standard deviations were less than 2.0 %.

本方法的回收率为100%~105%,相对标准偏差小于2.0%.

互联网

The relative standard deviation is less than 1.9 % . The recoveries are better than 97 %.

测得结果重现性好,相对标准偏差标准回收率>97%.

互联网

Results The correction factor was 0.8551 and relative standard deviation ( RSD ) was less than 3.5 %.

结果校正因子为 0.8551,本方法相对标准偏差小于3.5%,精密度、灵敏度较高.

互联网

The relative standard errors of prediction for calibration samples and prediction samples and 1.6713 % , respectively.

预测校正集样品和预测集样品芦丁含量的相对标准误差分别为0.0030%和1.6713%.

互联网

By means of temperature determination, the reconstructed insulation layer has reached the requirement of relative standard.

经温度测定, 改造后的保温层达到了有关标准的要求.

互联网

Know about quality system of TS 16949 , and other relative standard for material test lab.

熟知TS16949体系要求.以及其它材料试验室的标准要求.

互联网