experiment group

However, only small amount of new bone formation was found in experiment group, and the bone defect area was not significantly decreased.

In experiment group, muscles atrophy and derangement, inflammatory cells infiltration and increment of fatty deposition were observed.

Resuits: Comparing with control group, enamel decalcification decreased with statistically significant difference in experiment group.

This study employs the experimental designing mode of the experiment-group and the control-group before and after experiment training.

The control group the AI ascend all of the time. The AI of control group are lower than experiment group (P05)had significant difference.

Results The psychological state after operation in the experiment group is significantly better than the control group (P05).

Results: Compared to control group, pulmonary edema and inflammatory cells infiltrating appeared in the experiment group rats.

In microscopic observation, there were no periosteal necrosis and atrophy performance both in the experiment group and the control group.

Results: Students in the experiment group get better marks in examinations compared with students in the control group.

Results Hepatocyte showed multiple spotty necrosis in the experiment group.

The experiment group had a better performance in sports than that of the control group.

In the experiment group, trophozoites were induced to transform to cysts gradually.

Hemorheology improved more significantly in the experiment group than in the control group.

Significant difference (P05) of immunity level was observed on day 57 between the control and experiment group.

Result: The comfort level of experiment group was obviously higher than the one of control group.

METHODS: Theefficacy of control group and experiment group were observed and compared.

The regression equation was developed between titers of ELISA and HI test in each experiment group of geese.

Method: 84 patients with gastroscopy were randomly divided to experiment group and control group, and 42 patients per group.

All parameters were of no significant difference statistically between 6-days-experiment group and 6-days-control group.

The experiment group was established by normobaric hypoxia model.

Methods: The students were randomly divided into the experiment group and the control group.

The experiment group applied the three-dimension teaching based on case-centered method, the other group applied traditional methods.

Results Target microorganism infection was detected in 13(43. 3%) tissue samples in root canals in experiment group.

As a result, the experiment group enjoys a higher improvement than the control group.

A metacognitive training was made on the students in the experiment group.

It's higher on red blood cell count in experiment group than control group (P0. 05).

Results: The results of radio photography of experiment group is more effective than the compare groups (P 0. 05).

Experiment group: 10, with external application of Xiaoji powder on Shenque Point and Zhongwan Point of rats.

The mean parasitemia of HGXPRT ISA720 experiment group(29. 3%) was significantly lower than that of control groups (70. 0%) (P05).

Application of the Single-chip in General Console of Experiment Group

The results showed the daily gain of experiment group was 26. 5% higher than that of control before weaning (P01);