dynamic typing

UI development often demands better productivity and high flexibility, so dynamic typing is often preferred.

One of the side effects of dynamic typing is outstanding method names.

Dynamic typing allows all sorts of advanced meta-programming tricks that are difficult or impossible in a strongly typed language.

If you are accustomed to a strongly typed language, dynamic typing seems like a step toward anarchy.

First, the basic nature of dynamic typing hasn't changed.

Static versus dynamic typing depends on when a typing model is enforced.

At another level, dynamic typing saves effort in terms of raw lines of code.

Dynamic typing: Avro does not require that code be generated.

So based on the dynamic typing and higher-order functions, you can introduce arbitrary behavior to your classes at any time.

But Java developers are often blind to some of the benefits of dynamic typing.

With Groovy and its support for dynamic typing, there are fewer files to manage, too.

The dynamic typing still hinders the context-sensitivity in Ruby.

Ruby gives you an error at run time because Ruby supports dynamic typing.

The flexibility that dynamic typing permits is more important than you might think.