crisis-resolution

Germany and France are trying to put flesh on the bones of a crisis resolution plan in time for the EU summit.

The best outcome, in my view, would be a failure of the current crisis resolution strategy, following by a complete rebooting.

Beyond a crisis resolution regime, any sustainable solution path would have to start with the creation of a single European sovereign bond.

The latest phase of the crisis began with the decision by European leaders last month to create a "permanent crisis resolution mechanism" .

The actual outcome of the summit leaves us in a void, with no crisis resolution strategy in place.

With each week that passes the political and financial cost of crisis resolution becomes higher.

The irresistible force of EU-level crisis resolution will eventually come into conflict with the immovable object of national politics.

But the eurozone's crisis resolution is unlikely to proceed on the basis of a full-blown treaty change.

But in a fit of denial, Europe never developed a crisis-resolution mechanism.

At the same time, the euro for the European debt crisis resolution still lack of details package fell, the dollar fell more than 1%.

A permanent crisis resolution mechanism has already been agreed.

We must bolster an IMF early warning system for the global economy, focused on crisis prevention and not just crisis resolution.

The EU has still not provided a generalised crisis resolution regime.

It could derail the entire crisis resolution process.

A veto in March is thus a necessary first step in crisis resolution.

The eurozone's crisis-resolution is already unfolding a dynamic that is inconsistent with this.

I am afraid that without a force majeure event, there will be no crisis resolution.

In the meantime, there will be no crisis resolution.

The good news is that a new permanent crisis resolution mechanism has been put in place, starting in 2013.

Crisis Resolution And The Party Ability In Power