creationist

The standard creationist argument -- there is only one, they all reduce to this one -- takes off from a statistical improbability.

To stand up for science, former Scientific American editor-in-chief John Rennie compiled 15 rebuttals for such "creationist nonsense. "

They lobby for creationist ideas suchas "intelligent design" to be taught as alternatives to evolution inscience classrooms.

What are the legal prospects of the creationist fallback strategy?

They lobby for creationist ideas such as "intelligent design" to be taught as alternatives to evolution in science classrooms.

And if you subscribe to "creationist" tendencies, read it also and repent your sorry ways.

"We teach biology from a creationist perspective, " she says.

At the same time, some students have creationist beliefs.

She began to collect creationist literature and to study adherents' methods.

Are you concerned that your ideas will be trumpeted by the creationist movement?

Those papers, however, rarely attack evolution directly or advance creationist arguments;