code reviews

Time or rather lack of time seems to be a major inhibitor of code reviews.

By contrast, one area that never seems to be in the project plan is the task of performing code reviews.

I gave a talk recently to a number of portal practitioners at a conference, and one of my core recommendations was the idea of code reviews.

In deference to the concept of code reviews, you really can't enforce standards that have not been formalized or are not readily available.

Detailed code reviews are the best defense, but most companies do not have the time or resources to do this adequately.

The results showed that lightweight code reviews take one-fifth the time (or less) of formal reviews, yet they find just as many bugs.

One of the most life-altering events in my move from academia to industry was the discovery of code reviews.

Performing manual code reviews and inspections can be a highly effective way of identifying defects in code.

The second reason to consider creating a " test workspace " on your computer is to make it easier to complete code reviews .

Since studies have shown that code reviews reduce costs by improving quality, this should not be considered a burden.

Code reviews are one of the most effective ways to ensure that your reusable assets are being utilized appropriately.

Code reviews should be an enforced, integral part of the change management process.

Code reviews are the most effective and efficient method to validate code quality and ensure against code defects and faults of commission.

Code Review has an additional set of features that can help with standardizing the automated code reviews in a team of developers.

Participates in design and code reviews with a performance perspective.

Code reviews give you an opportunity to explain and better understand your own code, and give others an opportunity to view your code anew.

In the company, you will always have code reviews of how well you coded something.

No kidding! Code reviews aren't the ultimate solution to a broken design process, but they are an incredibly useful tool.

What prompted you to start doing code reviews on each check-in?

Code reviews can often be effective for spotting common pitfalls and can be done at a number of levels.

In code reviews, watch for code like that shown in the following examples.

Lead developers carry responsibility for code reviews, design, and unit testing coverage.

By using lightweight code review techniques, developers can review code in one-fifth the time needed for full, formal code reviews.

Don't take criticism personally. Code reviews are about improving code, not about bruising (or boosting) egos.

After code reviews, smoke testing is the most cost effective method for identifying and fixing defects in software.

Most code reviews now took place within the team through peer reviews.

I often find myself discovering ideas for new reusable assets while doing code reviews also.

Formal code reviews should include testing of the source code.

The following guidelines provide several techniques for design and code reviews.

These efforts range from renewed emphasis on the agile process to peer code reviews.

Code reviews are good, so do them all the time by writing code in pairs.

Participate in design and code reviews with other developers.

It offers integrated bug tracking, source code reviews, mailing lists to coordinate teams, and more.

We needed this role to confirm that code reviews were taking place, engineering notebooks were being maintained by developers, and so on.

In short: Code reviews are awesome. Everyone should use them. Heck, my dog should use them. You should too.

Crucible 2 introduces and supports the idea of iterative code reviews.

This is accomplished by initiating early peer and code reviews on the requirements and design documents.

Track all issues found during code reviews.

This analysis is beneficial for code reviews because it identifies locations in the code that are prone to bugs.

The idea behind the name is that there are best practices for software development, such as writing unit tests and code reviews.

An effective way of achieving this is through automated code reviews.

Don't code reviews slow you down? Somewhat.

Of course, you must actually do code reviews to realize the benefits.

This article presents a toolset for code reviews, along with examples of how these tools are used.

Code reviews may not make a lot of sense unless you have standards in place to measure them against.

Where possible, check compliance with existing processes, such as page and code reviews, and other project checkpoints.

Because the automated process is quick, you can run code reviews often.

I have started doing all my code reviews on a laptop because of the number command.

Doing code reviews (see #3) can help to prevent this.

It encompassed 2500 code reviews, 50 programmers, and 3. 2 million lines of code at Cisco Systems.

Code reviews are a great way to learn.

If it's not already hurting you, it almost certainly will (and mandatory code reviews for that person are not an option! )

Decision enforcement - reality: coaching, architectural templates, and code reviews are the dominating decision enforcement approaches

Guidelines for Conducting Design and Code Reviews

So there's a bunch of reasons to love code reviews: